journal article·2018-12Open access

Ultrasonic Spray Coating as a Fast Alternative Technique for the Deposition of Hybrid Magnetic‐Plasmonic Nanocomposites

Jeroen Stryckers, Tom Swusten, Ward Brullot, Jan D'Haen, Thierry Verbiest, Wim Deferme

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 20· Issue 12

Abstract

Advanced applications in optics, for example, Faraday isolators, demand for complex magneto‐plasmonic nanostructures which exhibit large Faraday rotation. These structures is fabricated by a Layer‐by‐Layer approach, albeit this being a slow technique. Here, the ultrasonic spray coating as a promising alternative method toward the formation of hybrid magneto‐plasmonic structures is pioneered by the authors. Ultrasonic spray coating is a stable, fast, and tunable mass production method applied in this work to deposit gold and iron oxide nanoparticles. Altering multiple deposition parameters give the spray coating technique a large amount of control over the coverage. Optical and magneto‐optical properties, layer formation and surface coverage of single and hybrid layers with increasing thickness and number of layers are studied and compared to samples synthesized by Layer‐by‐Layer deposition. Ultrasonic spray coating paves the way to the widespread application of innovative and versatile hybrid magnetic‐plasmonic nanocomposites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Materials Research (IMO‐IMOMEC) Hasselt University Wetenschapspark 1 B‐3590 Diepenbeek Belgium

IMEC vzw – Division IMOMEC Wetenschapspark 1 B‐3590 Diepenbeek Belgium

Division Molecular Imaging and Photonics KU Leuven Department of Chemistry Celestijnenlaan 200D 3001 Heverlee Belgium

Funding

KU Leuven

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20140540910.1002/adma.201405409 ↗
2. 10.1002/adom.20120001110.1002/adom.201200011 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.366513810.1063/1.3665138 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl900007k10.1021/nl900007k ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms260910.1038/ncomms2609 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.05710.1016/j.matlet.2013.12.057 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.05.01910.1016/j.mssp.2015.05.019 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4EE01546K10.1039/C4EE01546K ↗
9. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.01510.1016/j.orgel.2015.01.015 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.00510.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.orgel.2009.03.00610.1016/j.orgel.2009.03.006 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20080355110.1002/adma.200803551 ↗
13. 10.1109/TMAG.2005.85480510.1109/TMAG.2005.854805 ↗
14. 10.1039/df951110005510.1039/df9511100055 ↗
15. 10.1021/ed076p94910.1021/ed076p949 ↗
16. Stryckers J. · Phys. Status Solidi · 2016 · 6 · 1
17. 10.1121/1.190902010.1121/1.1909020 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma702115510.3390/ma7021155 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.01.06210.1016/j.cplett.2010.01.062 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.543210.1103/PhysRevB.56.5432 ↗