Low‐Cycle Fatigue Behavior and Life Prediction of Copper Busbar
Source abstract
Abstract
Copper has many applications especially in rotor parts subjected to fatigue loading. From them, a typical copper busbar is chosen to mainly investigate the low‐cycle fatigue (LCF) behaviors, fracture morphologies, dislocation patterns and crack initiation mechanism. It is found that with total strain amplitude increasing, cyclic softening appears in all the samples; the fatigue crack initiation sites transform mainly from slip bands to grain boundaries; the dislocation spacing of the post‐fatigue samples decreases; by comparison, the Basquin–Manson–Coffin and the simplified hysteresis energy relations are relatively simple and accurate methods to predict fatigue life. Finally, the LCF properties of the coppers with different grain sizes prepared by different technologies are compared and optimized.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science Institute of Metal Research Chinese Academy of Sciences 72 Wenhua Road Shenyang 110016 China
Power Generation Company China Southern Power Grid 32 Longkou East Road Guangzhou 510630 China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.09.00610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.09.006 ↗
2. 10.7736/KSPE.2012.29.12.134610.7736/KSPE.2012.29.12.1346 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478643560823808610.1080/14786435608238086 ↗
4. 10.1080/1478643740820723010.1080/14786437408207230 ↗
5. 10.1016/0025-5416(78)90174-X10.1016/0025-5416(78)90174-X ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00312-X10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00312-X ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.01110.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.05310.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.053 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.00710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.10.007 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.03610.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.10.036 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11661-007-9230-610.1007/s11661-007-9230-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00689-810.1016/S0921-5093(97)00689-8 ↗
14. Chapman D. · 2014
15. Bannantine J. A. · 1990
16. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01710.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01710.x ↗
17. 10.1017/CBO978051181094710.1017/CBO9780511810947 ↗
18. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
19. 10.1016/0036-9748(77)90298-810.1016/0036-9748(77)90298-8 ↗
20. Zhang Z. F. · Struct. Env. Eng · 1998 · 3 · 55
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.00610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.006 ↗
22. Woytowitz P. J. · 1996 · 186
23. Lee Y. L. · 2005
24. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.12.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.00210.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.002 ↗
26. Liu W. · 2000
27. Zhang Z. M. · Trans. Mater. Heat Treat · 2004 · 25 · 41
28. Zhang Z. J. · 2013
29. Wang Q. J. · 201110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.682.231 ↗
30. Korn M. · Kovove Mater · 2011 · 49 · 5110.4149/km_2011_1_51 ↗
31. Mughrabi H. · 1988
32. Höppel H. W. · 2000