Insight into the Microstructure and Tensile Behavior of the W–Cu Composite Reinforced with Tungsten Fibers and Particulates
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, the microstructure and tensile property of the tungsten fiber (Wf)‐reinforced W–Cu composite are investigated by both experimental and simulation methods. An electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD) analysis reveals the elongated <110> textured grains in the Wf compared with the matrix part, ensuring the small quantities of the grain boundaries along the direction perpendicular to the tensile direction. Tensile tests further confirm its improved strength by ≈8.0% (526.8 ± 5.3 MPa) compared with the composite without inserted Wf, with a satisfactory tensile strain of 5.9 ± 0.3%. Based on the fractography observation and finite‐element analysis, typically stable energy dissipation behavior of the composite is considered to be ascribed to the interactive competition between complex fracture modes, including frictional fiber pullout, elastic bridging, interface debonding, and crack deflection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering Xi'an University of Technology Xi'an 710048 China
National Center for Electron Microscopy in Beijing School of Materials Science and Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China
School of Materials Science Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an 710072 China
Funding
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nme.2019.02.03410.1016/j.nme.2019.02.034 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20180035410.1002/adem.201800354 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20190135210.1002/adem.201901352 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.05.00310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.05.003 ↗
5. 10.1088/1757-899X/139/1/01204310.1088/1757-899X/139/1/012043 ↗
6. 10.1080/02670836.2019.162401710.1080/02670836.2019.1624017 ↗
7. Mainzer B. · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2019
8. 10.1016/j.nme.2018.06.00310.1016/j.nme.2018.06.003 ↗
9. 10.1088/0031-8949/T167/1/01400610.1088/0031-8949/T167/1/014006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.03510.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.035 ↗
11. 10.1080/09276440.2018.147569610.1080/09276440.2018.1475696 ↗
12. Giancarli L. · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367 · 1270
13. 10.1038/nphys373510.1038/nphys3735 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.05410.1016/j.msea.2017.12.054 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.11151010.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111510 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.02.09810.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.02.098 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.01010.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.02010.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.020 ↗
19. 10.1080/02670836.2017.134376210.1080/02670836.2017.1343762 ↗
20. 10.1080/02670836.2018.145396110.1080/02670836.2018.1453961 ↗
21. 10.1080/02670836.2017.136671110.1080/02670836.2017.1366711 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.16310.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.163 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10942310.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109423 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-94-007-4342-710.1007/978-94-007-4342-7 ↗
25. 10.1002/adem.20190124210.1002/adem.201901242 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.022 ↗
27. Bunge H. J. · 1969