journal article·2020-11

Insight into the Microstructure and Tensile Behavior of the W–Cu Composite Reinforced with Tungsten Fibers and Particulates

Longchao Zhuo, Hailiang Wang, Bin Luo, Yiheng Zhang, Jintao Xu, Shuhua Liang, Qiqi Zhang, Nan Liu, Jiacheng Sun

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 22· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, the microstructure and tensile property of the tungsten fiber (Wf)‐reinforced W–Cu composite are investigated by both experimental and simulation methods. An electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD) analysis reveals the elongated <110> textured grains in the Wf compared with the matrix part, ensuring the small quantities of the grain boundaries along the direction perpendicular to the tensile direction. Tensile tests further confirm its improved strength by ≈8.0% (526.8 ± 5.3 MPa) compared with the composite without inserted Wf, with a satisfactory tensile strain of 5.9 ± 0.3%. Based on the fractography observation and finite‐element analysis, typically stable energy dissipation behavior of the composite is considered to be ascribed to the interactive competition between complex fracture modes, including frictional fiber pullout, elastic bridging, interface debonding, and crack deflection.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Fusion materials and technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering Xi'an University of Technology Xi'an 710048 China

National Center for Electron Microscopy in Beijing School of Materials Science and Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China

School of Materials Science Northwestern Polytechnical University Xi'an 710072 China

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nme.2019.02.03410.1016/j.nme.2019.02.034 ↗
2. 10.1002/adem.20180035410.1002/adem.201800354 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20190135210.1002/adem.201901352 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.05.00310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.05.003 ↗
5. 10.1088/1757-899X/139/1/01204310.1088/1757-899X/139/1/012043 ↗
6. 10.1080/02670836.2019.162401710.1080/02670836.2019.1624017 ↗
7. Mainzer B. · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2019
8. 10.1016/j.nme.2018.06.00310.1016/j.nme.2018.06.003 ↗
9. 10.1088/0031-8949/T167/1/01400610.1088/0031-8949/T167/1/014006 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.03510.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.035 ↗
11. 10.1080/09276440.2018.147569610.1080/09276440.2018.1475696 ↗
12. Giancarli L. · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 367 · 1270
13. 10.1038/nphys373510.1038/nphys3735 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.12.05410.1016/j.msea.2017.12.054 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.11151010.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111510 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.02.09810.1016/j.fusengdes.2019.02.098 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.01010.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.02010.1016/j.ijrmhm.2017.11.020 ↗
19. 10.1080/02670836.2017.134376210.1080/02670836.2017.1343762 ↗
20. 10.1080/02670836.2018.145396110.1080/02670836.2018.1453961 ↗
21. 10.1080/02670836.2017.136671110.1080/02670836.2017.1366711 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.16310.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.163 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10942310.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109423 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-94-007-4342-710.1007/978-94-007-4342-7 ↗
25. 10.1002/adem.20190124210.1002/adem.201901242 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.02210.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.022 ↗
27. Bunge H. J. · 1969