Numerical and Experimental Study of Strain Localization in Notched Specimens of a Ductile Steel on Meso‐ and Macroscales
Source abstract
Abstract
The computational approach for modeling the deformation behavior and fracture of materials with stress concentrators is proposed on the basis of the cellular automata technique. Numerical simulations performed on miniaturized specimens under dynamic loading are accompanied by laboratory tensile testing under quasi‐static conditions applied to the specimens of a ductile structural steel with three typical notch shapes. Using in situ acoustic emission paired with digital image correlation techniques, it is shown that the notch shape exerts a very strong influence on the development of localized plastic flow and crack initiation ahead of the notch tip. It is concluded that the stress release occurs most effectively when the modulation of various components of the force moment takes place on mesoscopic scale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science SB RAS (ISPMS SB RAS) Tomsk 634055 Russia
National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University Tomsk 634050 Russia
Department of Engineering Design and Materials − NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim 7491 Norway
Department of Management and Engineering University of Padova Vicenza 36100 Italy
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Freudenberger J. · 2009 · 75
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.03810.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11003-009-9170-y10.1007/s11003-009-9170-y ↗
4. Carmi R. · 2015 · 605
5. Flament C. · 2014
6. Panin V. E. · Phys. Mesomech · 1998 · 1 · 5
7. 10.1007/BF0056006710.1007/BF00560067 ↗
8. 10.1134/S102995991304001210.1134/S1029959913040012 ↗
9. Panin V. E. · Phys. Mesomech · 2012 · 15 · 113
10. 10.1111/ffe.1227910.1111/ffe.12279 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.02.00510.1016/j.tafmec.2014.02.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.04510.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.045 ↗
13. 10.1134/S102995991304007310.1134/S1029959913040073 ↗
14. 10.1134/S102995991503007810.1134/S1029959915030078 ↗
15. 10.1134/S102995991501004X10.1134/S102995991501004X ↗
16. Psakhie S. G. · Phys. Mesomech · 2014 · 17 · 1710.1134/S1029959914010020 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.06330210.1103/PhysRevE.91.063302 ↗
18. 10.1134/S102995991402006410.1134/S1029959914020064 ↗
19. Bringas J. E. · 2004 · 256
20. Pilkey W. D. · 2008 · 57
21. 10.1134/S102995991501002610.1134/S1029959915010026 ↗
22. 10.1134/S102995991504009810.1134/S1029959915040098 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11223-010-9202-810.1007/s11223-010-9202-8 ↗
24. Friedel J. · 1964
25. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.06.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.06.001 ↗
26. 10.1070/PU1975v018n01ABEH00468910.1070/PU1975v018n01ABEH004689 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11340-014-9922-y10.1007/s11340-014-9922-y ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.009 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.04810.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.048 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11340-015-0074-510.1007/s11340-015-0074-5 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.488468210.1063/1.4884682 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.01.00510.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.01.005 ↗
33. Shrama K. · Insight (Northampton, U. K.) · 2015 · 57 · 346
34. 10.1088/0022-3735/20/8/00110.1088/0022-3735/20/8/001 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.05310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.053 ↗
36. 10.1007/s11340-006-9824-810.1007/s11340-006-9824-8 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.03.01610.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.03.016 ↗
38. Sutton M. A. · 2009
39. 10.1063/1.489043610.1063/1.4890436 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.07.06310.1016/j.matlet.2016.07.063 ↗
41. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.24-25.22110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.24-25.221 ↗
42. 10.1177/147592171663680610.1177/1475921716636806 ↗