journal article·2014-12

Microstructural Development and Mechanical Properties for Reactive Air Brazing of ZTA to Ni Alloys Using AgCuO Braze Alloys

Erica Prevost, A. Joseph DeMarco, Beth MacMichael, Vineet V. Joshi, Alan Meier, John W. Hoffman, William J. Walker

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 16· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

In the current study, nickel (Ni) alloys were heat treated to form an oxide layer prior to reactive air brazing (RAB) joining to zirconia‐toughened alumina (ZTA). In the current study five Ni alloys were evaluated. The ZTA studied had compositions of 0–15 wt% zirconia and 0–14 wt% glass. Four point‐bend tests were performed to evaluate the joint strength of ZTA/ZTA and ZTA/nickel alloys brazed with Ag 2 wt% CuO braze alloys. The joint strength is not a function of the ZTA composition, but the strength is a strong function of the chemistry and microstructure of the oxide layer formed on the nickel alloy. An increase in the aluminum content of the Ni alloy resulted in an increase of the thickness of alumina in the oxide layer and was directly proportional to the bond strength.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Kazuo Inamori School of Engineering Alfred University Alfred NY 14802 USA

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA 99354 USA

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Montana Tech of the University of Montana Butte MT 59701 USA

Owens Corning Toledo OH 43607 USA

Federal‐Mogul Corporation Plymouth MI 48170 USA

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Johari Miab R. · Ceram. Int. · 2014
2. 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.01.00910.1016/j.matchar.2014.01.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.02010.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.020 ↗
4. 10.1149/1.185039110.1149/1.1850391 ↗
5. Zhu W. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2014
6. Kaletch A. · 2012 · 437
7. Bobzin K. · 2012 · 433
8. 10.1179/174328009X46107810.1179/174328009X461078 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11837-006-0052-610.1007/s11837-006-0052-6 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.189653010.1149/1.1896530 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11465-010-0007-z10.1007/s11465-010-0007-z ↗
12. Kim J. Y. · 2005 · 8
13. Kim J. Y. · 2004 · 101
14. Poenicke A. · 2012 · 450
15. Weil K. S. · Mat. Res. Symp. Proc. · 2003 · 756 · 551
16. Zink N. M. · Ceramic Eng. Sci. Proc. · 2005 · 26 · 391
17. 10.1149/1.159565910.1149/1.1595659 ↗
18. Pfaff E. M. · 2009 · 23
19. Weil K. S. · Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. · 2002 · 23 · 785
20. Weil K. S. · 2003 · 47
21. Weil K. S. · 2006 · 18510.1002/9781118405802.ch11 ↗
22. Birks N. · 2009 · 101
23. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.00510.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.08.005 ↗
24. Kim J. Y. · 2008 · 15
25. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.01410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.03.014 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00228-610.1016/S0272-8842(02)00228-6 ↗
27. 10.1023/A:101664871294710.1023/A:1016648712947 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05094.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05094.x ↗
29. MacMichael B. · 2005
30. DeMarco A. J. · 2005
31. Prevost E. L. · 2006
32. ASTM Standard C 1161‐94 · 1998
33. Joshi V. V. · 2010