Robust Cellular Shape‐Memory Ceramics via Gradient‐Controlled Freeze Casting
Source abstract
Abstract
Shape‐memory ceramics offer promise for applications like actuation and energy damping, due to their unique properties of high specific strength, high ductility, and inertness in harsh environments. To date, shape‐memory behavior in ceramics is limited to micro‐/submicro‐scale pillars and particles to circumvent the longstanding problem of transformation‐induced fracture which occurs readily in bulk polycrystalline specimens. The challenge, therefore, lies in the realization of shape‐memory properties in bulk ceramics, which requires careful design of 3D structures that locally mimic pillar structures. Herein, it is demonstrated that with a gradient‐controlled freeze‐casting approach, honeycomb‐like cellular structures can be fabricated with thin and directionally aligned walls to facilitate martensitic transformation under compression without fracture. With this approach, robust bulk shape‐memory ceramics are demonstrated in a highly porous structure under compressive stresses of 25 MPa and strains up to 7.5%.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Engineering and Applied Science California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/322234a010.1038/322234a0 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06383.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06383.x ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03278.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03278.x ↗
4. 10.1126/science.123974510.1126/science.1239745 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.124509710.1126/science.1245097 ↗
6. 10.1557/mrc.2017.9910.1557/mrc.2017.99 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.013 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03701.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03701.x ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.03010.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.030 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.05710.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.057 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.032 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.00610.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.006 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.04710.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.047 ↗
14. Gibson L. J. · 1999
15. 10.1002/adem.20070027010.1002/adem.200700270 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.03710.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.10.037 ↗
17. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00176.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00176.x ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20070015410.1002/adma.200700154 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170315510.1002/adma.201703155 ↗
20. Rettenmayr M. · 2001 · 218310.1016/B0-08-043152-6/00394-6 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7344-310.1007/978-1-4419-7344-3 ↗
22. Naviroj M. · 2017
23. Kurz W. · 1992
24. 10.1557/jmr.2017.13310.1557/jmr.2017.133 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.06510.1016/j.matlet.2006.08.065 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.03110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.031 ↗
27. 10.1111/jace.1497210.1111/jace.14972 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.04210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.042 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.05.01210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.05.012 ↗
30. Rettenmayr M. · Ref. Module Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng. · 2016