journal article·2016-09Open access

Influence of the Reinforcement Distribution and Interface on the Electronic Transport Properties of MWCNT‐Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites

Sebastián Suarez, Nicolás Souza, Federico Lasserre, Frank Mücklich

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 18· Issue 9

Abstract

The transition toward an electricity‐driven world is testing electrical contact materials to their limits. Specifically, new alternatives are needed where composites that sacrificed conductivity in exchange for reduced weldability and higher heat dissipation sufficed. Carbon nanotubes (CNT) have the potential to close the gap as ideal fillers due to their outstanding intrinsic properties, pushing the application limits further. However, the reported electrical conductivity measurements show no clear tendency. In the present study, the authors attempt to shed some light on this matter by focusing on the causes behind those results. It is observed that the addition of 1 wt% CNT improves the conductivity of nickel, followed by a drop for higher concentrations, measured by four‐point probe testing. Six nanotube orientation models describing different CNT arrangements are contrasted to the experimental data. Corrected values for nickel and CNT resistivities effectively place that of the composites close to the models, providing indications of a preferential orientation. It is concluded that, in contrast to what is widely reported, the main contributing factors to the resistivity are inter‐tube coupling, porosity, and interfacial scattering, whereas clustering marginally influences the behavior.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Thermal properties of materials · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Functional Materials, Department of Materials Science and Engineering Saarland University Campus D 3.3 Saarbrücken 66123 Germany

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1051/epjap/200921010.1051/epjap/2009210 ↗
2. Pierson H. · 1993
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.032 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.461310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4613 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.139663210.1063/1.1396632 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.88265810.1063/1.882658 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00285-110.1016/S0008-6223(98)00285-1 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12613-011-0499-510.1007/s12613-011-0499-5 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11106-008-9055-x10.1007/s11106-008-9055-x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matchar.2005.05.00310.1016/j.matchar.2005.05.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.012 ↗
12. 10.2320/matertrans.MRA200708410.2320/matertrans.MRA2007084 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.diamond.2009.02.00810.1016/j.diamond.2009.02.008 ↗
14. 10.1166/jnn.2007.30710.1166/jnn.2007.307 ↗
15. 10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/00310.1088/1367-2630/6/1/003 ↗
16. 10.1002/adem.20120010010.1002/adem.201200100 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.05810.1016/j.msea.2013.08.058 ↗
18. Ohser J. · 2000
19. 10.1088/0022-3727/29/5/03610.1088/0022-3727/29/5/036 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mser.2008.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2008.07.001 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb07576.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb07576.x ↗
22. 10.1080/1364281860823897110.1080/13642818608238971 ↗
23. Hamilton R. L. · IEC Fundam · 1959 · 1 · 18710.1021/i160003a005 ↗
24. Lide D. R. · 2009
25. 10.1007/s00339-003-2424-x10.1007/s00339-003-2424-x ↗
26. 10.1038/382054a010.1038/382054a0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.02210.1016/j.carbon.2009.10.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.00210.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.002 ↗
29. 10.1002/adem.20140035210.1002/adem.201400352 ↗
30. 10.1109/TNANO.2004.82855310.1109/TNANO.2004.828553 ↗
31. 10.1039/b9nr00127a10.1039/b9nr00127a ↗
32. 10.1063/1.12301110.1063/1.123011 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.10.01010.1016/j.carbon.2007.10.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.12.04110.1016/j.carbon.2008.12.041 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.04110.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.041 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.370351010.1149/1.3703510 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.281969010.1063/1.2819690 ↗