journal article·2015-12

Aging Processes in Ultrafine‐Grained Low‐Alloyed Bronzes Subjected to Equal Channel Angular Pressing

Sergey V. Dobatkin, Natalia R. Bochvar, Daria V. Shangina

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 17· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The aging processes in Cu‐0.7% Cr, Cu‐0.9% Hf, and Cu‐0.7% Cr‐0.9% Hf alloys after equal channel angular pressing have been studied. ECAP leads to strong grain refinement (200 nm for Cu‐0.7% Cr‐0.9% Hf alloy). It was shown that the Cu5Hf particles are more efficient as strengthening phase than the particles of Cr‐based solid solution. Alloying with hafnium also improves the thermal stability of hardening and minimizes recrystallization processes at aging temperatures. Temperature‐time aging regimes of bronzes for achieving optimal combination of strength, ductility, and electrical conductivity were also determined. Ternary alloy after aging at 500 °C for 2.5 h has a tensile strength of 582 MPa, an elongation of 18%, and an electrical conductivity of 75% IACS.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites · Metallurgy and Material Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

A. A. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science of Russian Academy of Sciences 119991 Moscow Russia

National University of Science and Technology “MISIS” Laboratory of Hybrid Nanostructured Materials 119049 Moscow Russia

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Valiev R. Z. · 2014
2. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00437-210.1016/S1359-6454(01)00437-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.04610.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.046 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.10510.1016/j.msea.2007.01.105 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02610.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.06.04210.1016/j.msea.2008.06.042 ↗
7. 10.3139/146.11011110.3139/146.110111 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-009-9895-010.1007/s11661-009-9895-0 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.09810.1016/j.msea.2011.12.098 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.02210.1016/j.msea.2012.07.022 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.06910.1016/j.msea.2011.12.069 ↗
12. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.922.65110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.922.651 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.wear.2014.01.00710.1016/j.wear.2014.01.007 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.06510.1016/j.msea.2015.01.065 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.wear.2014.12.02210.1016/j.wear.2014.12.022 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-010-4643-910.1007/s10853-010-4643-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.05610.1016/j.msea.2011.06.056 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10853-012-6587-810.1007/s10853-012-6587-8 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-012-6525-910.1007/s10853-012-6525-9 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.10410.1016/j.msea.2013.12.104 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-014-8339-410.1007/s10853-014-8339-4 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.487465510.1063/1.4874655 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.03.14410.1016/j.matlet.2015.03.144 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0286872710.1007/BF02868727 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0287746010.1007/BF02877460 ↗
26. Drits M. E. · 1979
27. Nikolaev A. K. · 2012
28. Rosenberg V. M. · 1989