journal article·2025-12-19Open access

What Do Large Language Models Know About Materials?

Adrian Ehrenhofer, Thomas Wallmersperger, Gianaurelio Cuniberti

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in the fields of mechanical engineering and materials science. As models that establish connections through the interface of language, LLMs can be applied for step‐wise reasoning through the processing–structure–property–performance (PSPP) chain of materials science and engineering. Current LLMs are built for adequately representing a dataset, which consists of a significant subset of the accessible internet. However, the internet mostly contains nonscientific content. If LLMs should be applied for engineering purposes, it is valuable to investigate models for their intrinsic knowledge: the capacity to generate correct information about materials. In the current work, for the example of the Periodic Table of Elements, the role of vocabulary and tokenization for the uniqueness of material fingerprints and the LLMs’ capabilities of generating factually correct output of different state‐of‐the‐art open models are highlighted. This leads to a material knowledge benchmark for an informed choice, for which steps in the PSPP chain LLMs can be applied and where specialized models are required.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Material Selection and Properties · Model Reduction and Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Solid Mechanics & Dresden Center for Intelligent Materials TU Dresden George‐Bähr‐Str. 3c 01069 Dresden Germany

Institute of Materials Science & Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials Germany & Dresden Center for Intelligent Materials Technische Universität Dresden Hallwachsstr. 3 01069 Dresden Germany

References (99)

Show source-provided references
1. A.Vaswani N.Shazeer N.Parmar J.Uszkoreit L.Jones A. N.Gomez Ł.Kaiser I.Polosukhin 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) Long Beach CA2017.
2. L.Gao S.Biderman S.Black L.Golding T.Hoppe C.Foster J.Phang H.He A.Thite N.Nabeshima et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.000272020.
3. Patel J. M. · 2020 · 27710.1007/978-1-4842-6576-5_6 ↗
4. A.Liesenfeld M.Dingemanse inProc. of the 2024 ACM Conf. on Fairness Accountability and Transparency2024 pp.1774–1787.10.1145/3630106.3659005 ↗
5. N.Carlini D.Ippolito M.Jagielski K.Lee F.Tramer C.Zhang inThe Eleventh Int. Conf. on Learning Representations2022.
6. A. S.Luccioni J. D.Viviano arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02732 2021.
7. A.Ehrenhofer T.Wallmersperger inProc. of the ECCOMAS Smart Conf.2025.
8. A.Ehrenhofer P.Bakardjiev Y.Wang A.Voigt U.Marschner A.Richter T.Wallmersperger in2024 Symp. on Design Test Integration and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS (DTIP)2024 pp.1–6.10.1109/DTIP62575.2024.10613130 ↗
9. Agrawal A. · Apl Mater. · 2016 · 4 · 05320810.1063/1.4946894 ↗
10. Wang Y. · Eng. Rep. · 2024 · 6 · e1289310.1002/eng2.12893 ↗
11. Curtarolo S. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 19110.1038/nmat3568 ↗
12. Choudhary K. · npj Comput. Mater. · 2022 · 8 · 5910.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 ↗
13. Ramakrishna S. · J. Intell. Manufact. · 2019 · 30 · 230710.1007/s10845-018-1392-0 ↗
14. Zhou T. · Engineering · 2019 · 5 · 101710.1016/j.eng.2019.02.011 ↗
15. Ohana R. · Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. · 2024 · 37 · 44989
16. D. S.Levine M.Shuaibi E. W. C.Spotte‐Smith M. G.Taylor M. R.Hasyim K.Michel I.Batatia G.Csányi M.Dzamba P.Eastman et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.087622025.
17. Ong S. P. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 68 · 31410.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
18. Huan T. D. · Sci. Data · 2016 · 3 · 1
19. Curtarolo S. · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 58 · 21810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005 ↗
20. Sarker P. · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 498010.1038/s41467-018-07160-7 ↗
21. Doan Tran H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 128 · 1710.1063/5.0023759 ↗
22. Kuenneth C. · Patterns · 2021 · 2 · 410.1016/j.patter.2021.100238 ↗
23. Jumper J. · Nature · 2021 · 596 · 58310.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
24. Yin B. · Compos. Struct. · 2021 · 273 · 11432810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114328 ↗
25. Bonfanti S. · Nat. Comput. Sci. · 2024 · 4 · 57410.1038/s43588-024-00672-x ↗
26. Szymanski N. J. · Nature · 2023 · 624 · 8610.1038/s41586-023-06734-w ↗
27. Huan T. D. · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 01410610.1103/PhysRevB.92.014106 ↗
28. Ramprasad R. · npj Comput. Mater. · 2017 · 3 · 5410.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
29. Xu H. · Energy Environ. Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 23410.1002/eem2.12053 ↗
30. White A. D. · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2023 · 7 · 45710.1038/s41570-023-00502-0 ↗
31. Jablonka K. M. · Digital Discovery · 2023 · 2 · 123310.1039/D3DD00113J ↗
32. D.Zhang W.Liu Q.Tan J.Chen H.Yan Y.Yan J.Li W.Huang X.Yue W.Ouyang et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.068522024.
33. Jablonka K. M. · Nat. Mach. Intell. · 2024 · 6 · 16110.1038/s42256-023-00788-1 ↗
34. Scherbakov D. · J. Am. Med. Info. Assoc. · 2025 · 32 · 107110.1093/jamia/ocaf063 ↗
35. Kononova O. · Sci. Data · 2019 · 6 · 20310.1038/s41597-019-0224-1 ↗
36. Dagdelen J. · Nat. Commun. · 2024 · 15 · 141810.1038/s41467-024-45563-x ↗
37. Oliveira O. N. · Front. Chem. · 2022 · 10 · 93036910.3389/fchem.2022.930369 ↗
38. Bai X. · npj Comput. Mater. · 2025 · 11 · 5110.1038/s41524-025-01540-6 ↗
39. N.Patki R.Wedge K.Veeramachaneni in2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) IEEE2016 pp.399–410.10.1109/DSAA.2016.49 ↗
40. Lv S. · Mater. Genome Eng. Adv. · 2025 · e7001310.1002/mgea.70013 ↗
41. B.AlKhamissi M.Li A.Celikyilmaz M.Diab M.Ghazvininejad arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.060312022.
42. C.Wang X.Liu Y.Yue X.Tang T.Zhang C.Jiayang Y.Yao W.Gao X.Hu Z.Qi et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.075212023.
43. Singhal K. · Nature · 2023 · 620 · 17210.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 ↗
44. M.Sung J.Lee S.Yi M.Jeon S.Kim J.Kang arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.071542021.
45. H.Lakkaraju D.Slack Y.Chen C.Tan S.Singh arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.018752022.
46. Radford A. · OpenAI blog · 2019 · 1 · 9
47. Wang X. · Data Sci. Eng. · 2025 · 1
48. Wei J. · Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. · 2022 · 35 · 24824
49. Brown T. · Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. · 2020 · 33 · 1877
50. Baker M. · Nature · 2016 · 533 · 35310.1038/nature17990 ↗
51. F.Fidler J.WilcoxReproducibility of Scientific Results2018.
52. Chawla N. V. · J. Artif. Intell. Res. · 2002 · 16 · 32110.1613/jair.953 ↗
53. Spiegelhalter D. · 2019
54. Fanelli D. · Scientometrics · 2012 · 90 · 89110.1007/s11192-011-0494-7 ↗
55. Taniike T. · Nat. Catal. · 2023 · 6 · 10810.1038/s41929-023-00920-9 ↗
56. J.Łucki B.Wei Y.Huang P.Henderson F.Tramèr J.Rando arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.180252024.
57. Zhang D. · AI Ethics · 2024 · 1
58. Liu S. · Nat. Mach. Intell. · 2025 · 1
59. Kapoor S. · Patterns · 2023 · 4 · 910.1016/j.patter.2023.100804 ↗
60. Haibe‐Kains B. · Nature · 2020 · 586 · E1410.1038/s41586-020-2766-y ↗
61. Raff E. · Adv. Neural Info. Process. Syst. · 2019 · 32
62. A.Ehrenhofer T.Wallmersperger SHAPES_Tables: A living document with a collection of sources for active materials and concepts of soft‐hard active‐passive embedded structures (SHAPES) 2025 https://zenodo.org/records/15000565.
63. Thik J. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2023 · 11 · 2584910.1039/D3TA05457H ↗
64. A.Mavrogiannis C.Mavrogiannis Y.Aloimonos in2024 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)2024 pp.17679–17686.10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10611086 ↗
65. Z.Tan C.Zhao R.Moraffah Y.Li S.Wang J.Li T.Chen H.Liu arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.194172024.
66. Vollmer L. · J. Chem. Info. Model. · 2024 · 64 · 587810.1021/acs.jcim.4c00647 ↗
67. Ehrenhofer A. · Smart Mater. Struct. · 2025 · 34 · 03300510.1088/1361-665X/adbdb3 ↗
68. A.Ehrenhofer A.Mieting S.Pfeil J.Mersch C.Cherif G.Gerlach T.Wallmersperger inProc. SPIE 11587 Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) XXII(Ed:Y.Bar‐Cohen) Vol.11375 International Society for Optics and Photonics SPIE2020 pp.47–58.
69. S.Binder A.Ehrenhofer A.Mieting Stimulus‐responsive Mesh Patent No. US17/329 371 Granted on 08 July 2025 Submitted on 25 May2021.
70. I.Provilkov D.Emelianenko E.Voita inProc. of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics2020 pp.1882–1892.
71. Ali M. · 2024 · 390710.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.247 ↗
72. Huang L. · ACM Trans. Info. Syst. · 2025 · 43 · 1
73. Wang B. · 2023
74. J.Devlin M.‐W.Chang K.Lee K.Toutanova inProc. of the 2019 Conference of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies2019 Vol.1 pp.4171–4186.10.18653/v1/N19-1423 ↗
75. Mendelejew D. · Zeitschrift für Chemie · 1869 · 12 · 405
76. Schwerdtfeger P. · Nat. Rev. Chem. · 2020 · 4 · 35910.1038/s41570-020-0195-y ↗
77. Sheehan W. · Chemistry · 1976 · 49 · 17
78. Cole‐Hamilton D. J. · Chem. Int. · 2019 · 41 · 2310.1515/ci-2019-0409 ↗
79. Green J. · Geolog. Soc. Am. Bull. · 1959 · 70 · 112710.1130/0016-7606(1959)70[1127:GTOTEF]2.0.CO;2 ↗
80. Sigel H. · Zeitschrift für Naturforschung B · 2019 · 74 · 46110.1515/znb-2019-0056 ↗
81. Torrens F. · 2018 · 25
82. Ł.Mentel https://github. com/lmmentel/mendeleev2021.
83. A.Ehrenhofer T.Wallmersperger G. (Giovanni)Cuniberti LLM_Material_Property_Benchmark: A Python toolkit for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in materials science workflows (v1.01) Zenodo2025 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17136022.
84. P.Rust J.Pfeiffer I.Vulić S.Ruder I.Gurevych inProc. of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th Int. Joint Conf. on Natural Language Processing2021 Vol.1 pp.3118–3135.
85. O.Ahia S.Kumar H.Gonen J.Kasai D. R.Mortensen N. A.Smith Y.Tsvetkov arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.137072023.
86. A.Kamath J.Ferret S.Pathak N.Vieillard R.Merhej S.Perrin T.Matejovicova A.Ramé M.Rivière et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.197862025.
87. A.Gema P.Minervini L.Daines T.Hope B.Alex inProc. of the 6th Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop2024 pp.91–104.10.18653/v1/2024.clinicalnlp-1.9 ↗
88. Gu Y. · ACM Trans. Comput. Healthcare · 2021 · 3 · 110.1145/3458754 ↗
89. B.Peng X.Ling Z.Chen H.Sun X.Ning arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.088312024.
90. A.Radford J. W.Kim T.Xu G.Brockman C.McLeavey I.Sutskever inInt. Conference on Machine Learning PMLR2023 pp.28492–28518.
91. A.Yamaguchi A.Villavicencio N.Aletras arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.114772024.
92. C.Herold M.Kozielski N.Santavas Y.Versley S.Khadivi arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.261242025.
93. Z.Csaki P.Pawakapan U.Thakker Q.Xu arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.057412023.
94. Kirkpatrick J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. · 2017 · 114 · 352110.1073/pnas.1611835114 ↗
95. M.Riviere S.Pathak P. G.Sessa C.Hardin S.Bhupatiraju L.Hussenot T.Mesnard B.Shahriari A.Ramé et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.001182024.
96. M.Abdin J.Aneja H.Behl S.Bubeck R.Eldan S.Gunasekar M.Harrison R. J.Hewett M.Javaheripi P.Kauffmann et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.089052024.
97. A.Dubey A.Jauhri A.Pandey A.Kadian A.Al‐Dahle A.Letman A.Mathur A.Schelten A.Yang A.Fan et al. arXiv2024 2407.
98. A.Yang A.Li B.Yang B.Zhang B.Hui B.Zheng B.Yu C.Gao C.Huang C.Lv et al. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.093882025.
99. A. Q.Jiang A.Sablayrolles A.Mensch C.Bamford D. S.Chaplot D.de las Casas F.Bressand G.Lengyel G.Lample L.Saulnier L. R.Lavaud M.‐A.Lachaux P.Stock T. L.Scao T.Lavril T.Wang T.Lacroix W. E.Sayed Mistral 7b 2023.