journal article·2026-01Open access

Numerical Model and Experimental Validation of Composite Metal Foam in Protecting Carbon Steel Against Puncture

Aman Kaushik, Afsaneh Rabiei

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 28· Issue 1

Abstract

Puncture testing on carbon steel plates is performed at varying velocities with and without composite metal foam (CMF) buffer panel using numerical and experimental approaches. CMF is a lightweight material made with airtight hollow spheres embedded inside metallic matrix. In this study, three numerical modeling approaches are utilized for CMF panel located between puncture head and carbon steel plate. First, homogeneous CMF framework is utilized without entrapped air in model. The nonhomogeneous CMF framework is then extended, but leads to nonconclusive results due to extra‐ordinary resources required owing to the size and complexity of CMF. Finally, a new nonhomogeneous numerical model is developed to incorporate air using fluid cavity to reduce computation time while maintaining accuracy. The specific energy absorbed via CMF panel in experimental approach compared to that of fluid cavity model and carbon steel plate model are 28.14, 32.57, and 0.60 J g −1 , respectively. This study validates the applicability of fluid cavity model to accurately predict the performance of complex CMF under puncture against experimental testing. Higher energy absorption associated with CMF underscores its significance in preventing puncture in carbon steel plate. It is concluded that lightweight steel CMF can absorb puncture and impact energies more efficiently than heavy solid steel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Materials Research Lab Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh 27606 USA

Funding

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. T. H.Brown Examining the State of Rail Safety in the Aftermath of the Derailment in East Palestine Ohio U.S Department of Transportation2024 https://www.transportation.gov/examining‐state‐rail‐safety‐aftermath‐derailment‐east‐palestine‐ohio‐0.
2. 10.1002/fam.291210.1002/fam.2912 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.10633610.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106336 ↗
4. 10.1002/adem.20200069310.1002/adem.202000693 ↗
5. Kirkpatrick S. W. · 2015
6. Eshraghi S. · 2020
7. Rakoczy P. · 2019
8. Sullivan L. · 2022
9. 10.1002/adem.20160077610.1002/adem.201600776 ↗
10. 10.1177/109963622094288010.1177/1099636220942880 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.02710.1016/j.msea.2015.02.027 ↗
12. 10.1002/adem.20230143010.1002/adem.202301430 ↗
13. 10.1002/adem.20240126710.1002/adem.202401267 ↗
14. A.Rabiei(North Carolina State University) U.S. PatentUS7641984B22010
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.02610.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.026 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.031 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.12581710.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125817 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.10945010.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.109450 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tust.2021.10430610.1016/j.tust.2021.104306 ↗
20. 10.3390/ma1216252210.3390/ma12162522 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.10506010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105060 ↗
22. Dassault System · 2024
23. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-410.1016/S0022-5096(99)00082-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.02810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.11.028 ↗
25. 10.1155/2022/923510610.1155/2022/9235106 ↗
26. S.Szyniszewski B.Smith S.Arwade J.Hajjar S.Benjamin in12th Int. LS‐DYNA Users Conf. Dearborn MI2012 pp.1–10.
27. B. P.Neville Processing and development of an ultra-light high strength material through powder metallurgy2007.
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.07510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.075 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.11.014 ↗
30. Eshraghi S. · 2020
31. J. L.Lacome in6th Int. LS‐DYNA Users Conf. Detroit USA 2000 pp.7–30.
32. 10.1007/s11831-010-9040-710.1007/s11831-010-9040-7 ↗
33. Soe S. · Addit. Manuf. · 2021 · 39 · 101885
34. 10.1016/j.simpat.2015.02.00310.1016/j.simpat.2015.02.003 ↗
35. 10.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/01207210.1088/1757-899X/1076/1/012072 ↗
36. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.612.10510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.612.105 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.00210.1016/j.firesaf.2017.03.002 ↗
38. J.Wang T.Chen D.Sleight A.Tessler in45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics & Materials Conf. Palm Springs CA2004 p.1580.
39. F.Pan J.Zhu A. O.Helminen R.Vatanparast in9th Int. LS‐DYNA Users Conf. Dearborn MIJune2006 pp.4–6.
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.10810.1016/j.msea.2012.11.108 ↗