Influence of Temperature on Scratch and Wear Properties of Technical Thermoplastics: Implications for Material Selection
Source abstract
Abstract
Technical thermoplastics offer beneficial properties, such as high strength‐to‐weight ratio, chemical resistance, and durability, that make them valuable in various industries, including automotive, aerospace, and electronics, and in applications such as medical devices. Some technical thermoplastics also offer superior tribological properties, although these are sensitive to ambient temperature. This study investigates the scratch and wear properties of aliphatic polyketone (APK), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and polycarbonate (PC) at three different ambient temperatures and discusses them in the context of their dynamic mechanical properties with an aim to expand their scope of application, durability, and lifespan in applications with temperature differences. Tension, compression, shear, and hardness properties of the three materials across test temperatures follow the dynamic mechanical stiffness behavior. APK and PBT's scratch performance deteriorate with temperature, whereas PC's performance improves for an asymmetric indenter. The wear performance of APK is unaffected by ambient temperature despite the reductions in tensile, compressive, and shear strengths at elevated temperatures. This research provides crucial insights for optimizing the selection and design of thermoplastics for improved performance and sustainability in tribological applications. This proof of concept is a step toward developing novel green tribological technologies by making tribomaterials sustainable by ecodesign.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Materials Science and Technology TU Wien Getreidemarkt 9 1060 Wien Austria
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/978111808773210.1002/9781118087732 ↗
2. 10.1002/978111810472910.1002/9781118104729 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10884510.1016/j.triboint.2023.108845 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.10952510.1016/j.triboint.2024.109525 ↗
5. American Chemistry Council. Chemistry and Automobiles ‐ Lighting the Way to the Future of Motor Vehicles2023.
6. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10877910.1016/j.triboint.2023.108779 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.10622110.1016/j.triboint.2020.106221 ↗
8. Goergescu C. · Mater. Plast. · 2012 · 49 · 151
9. 10.5772/4824610.5772/48246 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.06410.1016/j.rser.2012.02.064 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10311-020-01090-x10.1007/s10311-020-01090-x ↗
12. M.Sepe Tracing the History of Polymeric Materials: Aliphatic Polyketone. Plast Technol2022 https://www.ptonline.com/articles/tracing‐the‐history‐of‐polymeric‐materials‐part‐19(accessed April 5 2024).
13. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.22310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.223 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.405414010.1115/1.4054140 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10632410.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106324 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.wear.2019.20308910.1016/j.wear.2019.203089 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.08.00110.1016/j.triboint.2018.08.001 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.3987010.1002/app.39870 ↗
19. 10.3390/ma1423731810.3390/ma14237318 ↗
20. 10.1080/00222348.2013.80893210.1080/00222348.2013.808932 ↗
21. 10.1016/0043-1648(93)90062-Q10.1016/0043-1648(93)90062-Q ↗
22. 10.1016/0043-1648(83)90316-210.1016/0043-1648(83)90316-2 ↗
23. 10.1177/1350650124129250610.1177/13506501241292506 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.01710.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.017 ↗
25. 10.1016/0041-2678(71)90136-910.1016/0041-2678(71)90136-9 ↗
26. 10.1533/9781782421788.3710.1533/9781782421788.37 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.10756110.1016/j.triboint.2022.107561 ↗
28. 10.1557/jmr.2007.030710.1557/jmr.2007.0307 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00409-410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00409-4 ↗
30. Brostow W. · North · 2004 · 25 · 119
31. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.02.00810.1016/j.mechmat.2011.02.008 ↗
32. 10.1002/1099-0488(20010101)39:1<47::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-210.1002/1099-0488(20010101)39:1<47::AID-POLB50>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
33. Hüttmann F. · 2017
34. Statista. Distribution of demand for engineering plastics worldwide in 2020 by resin 2021 https://www.statista.com/statistics/1411507/global‐demand‐for‐engineering‐plastics‐by‐type/(accessed April 15 2025).
35. 10.1007/s40544-013-0012-410.1007/s40544-013-0012-4 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0074510.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00745 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.10692510.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106925 ↗
38. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 527‐2:2012‐Plastics — Determination of tensile properties — Part 2: Test conditions for molding and extrusion plastics2012.
39. ASTM International. ASTM D732‐17 ‐ Standard Test Method for Shear Strength of Plastics by Punch Tool2017 https://doi.org/10.1520/D0732‐17.10.1520/D0732 ↗
40. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 2039‐1—Determination of hardness — Part 1: Ball indentation method2001.
41. Tribonet Hertzian Stress Calculator – Elliptical and Point Contacts2017 https://www.tribonet.org/calculators/hertz‐pressure‐calculator/(accessed April 18 2025).
42. 10.1163/016942410X51104210.1163/016942410X511042 ↗
43. 10.1002/pen.1070210.1002/pen.10702 ↗
44. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1518‐1:2019‐General test methods for paints and varnishes2019.
45. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026930.12462.3d10.1023/B:JMSC.0000026930.12462.3d ↗
46. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.04.01110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.04.011 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.1016510.1002/app.10165 ↗
48. 10.1115/1.48278410.1115/1.482784 ↗
49. Sperling L. H. · 2006
50. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.05.00510.1016/j.wear.2012.05.005 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.wear.2022.20456210.1016/j.wear.2022.204562 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12250410.1016/j.polymer.2020.122504 ↗
53. 10.1002/mawe.20030068710.1002/mawe.200300687 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.06.02410.1016/j.triboint.2015.06.024 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10853-010-4243-810.1007/s10853-010-4243-8 ↗
56. 10.1007/s13233-010-0606-x10.1007/s13233-010-0606-x ↗
57. 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07314-010.1016/S0043-1648(96)07314-0 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.02.00210.1016/j.porgcoat.2003.02.002 ↗
59. 10.1115/1.164553510.1115/1.1645535 ↗
60. 10.1023/A:100479801991410.1023/A:1004798019914 ↗
61. 10.3390/ma1405126110.3390/ma14051261 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.01610.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.016 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.wear.2019.20308310.1016/j.wear.2019.203083 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.01810.1016/j.wear.2017.01.018 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.02.02410.1016/j.triboint.2015.02.024 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.triboint.2006.12.00210.1016/j.triboint.2006.12.002 ↗
67. D.‐S.Bataev K. N.Mazhiev P. U.Goitemirov M. U.Umarov Evaluation of Fatigue Wear and the Nature of the Destruction of Polymeric Materials. Proc. Int. Symp. “Engineering Earth Sci. Appl. Fundam. Res. (ISEES 2018) Paris France: Atlantis Press2018 https://doi.org/10.2991/isees‐18.2018.42.10.2991/isees-18.2018.42 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.triboint.2004.03.00210.1016/j.triboint.2004.03.002 ↗
69. 10.1016/0043-1648(92)90271-910.1016/0043-1648(92)90271-9 ↗
70. 10.1016/0301-679X(92)90061-Q10.1016/0301-679X(92)90061-Q ↗