journal article·2015-11-01

Modeling of environmentally assisted fatigue crack growth behavior

Daniel Kujawski, Phani C.R. Sree

Corrosion Reviews· Volume 33· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract It is well recognized that environment has a significant role on the failure of mechanically loaded structures. In most cases of cyclic loading, fatigue crack growth (FCG) behavior exhibits lower threshold and faster growth rate in air than in vacuum. It is well documented that the effect of loading frequency on FCG behavior can be more pronounced in aggressive environment/material systems. This is seen in the K max term of the FCG. On the other hand, a weak dependence of FCG behavior with R ratio in inert environment indicates that a crack extension is governed mainly by Δ K . Existing experimental data indicate that the actual crack extension per cycle is associated with the rising part of the load cycle than the unloading part. In this paper, the synergetic role of environment and mechanical loading on crack growth behavior is considered to see their roles on FCG. In this article, we attempt to model how crack extension interplays between a crack-tip opening and crack-tip blunting angle associated with the applied load and environment, respectively. To support such a model for discussion, we have selected limited FCG data taken from literature corresponding to different environments ranging from vacuum to air and NaCl solution for a number of alloys and with different specimens geometries. We are also not discussing innate mechanisms for each alloy, due to space concerns.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49009, USA

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bennet JA. Effect of reaction with the atmosphere during fatigue in metals. In: Burke JJ, Reed NL, Weiss V, editors. Fatigue an interdisciplinary approach. Syracuse, NY, USA: University of Syracuse, 1964: 209–227.
2. Bradford SA, Lee T. Effect of strain rate on stress corrosion cracking of brass. Corrosion 1978; 34: 96–98.10.5006/0010-9312-34.3.96 ↗
3. Brown BF. Stress corrosion cracking in high-strength steels and in titanium and aluminum alloys. US Govt. Printing Office, NRL, Washington DC, 1972.
4. Dugdale D. Yielding in sheet containing slits. J Strain Anal 1961; 8: 100–104.10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
5. Gangloff RP. Corrosion fatigue crack propagation in metals. Proceedings of Environment-Induced Cracking of Metals, NACE-10, National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, 1990: 55–109.
6. Garud YS. Quantitative evaluation of environmentally assisted cracking: a survey of developments and application of modeling concepts. J Pressure Vessel Technol Trans ASME 1991; 112: 1–9.10.1115/1.2928722 ↗
7. Gingell ADB, King JE. Effect of frequency on environmentally assisted fatigue crack growth in aluminum alloy 7150-T651. Acta Mater 1997; 45: 3855–3870.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00033-5 ↗
8. Gough HJ, Sopwith DG. The behavior of a single crystal of aluminum under alternating torsional stresses while immersed in a slow stream of tap water. Proc R Soc London Ser A 1932a; 135: 392–411.10.1098/rspa.1932.0042 ↗
9. Gough HJ, Sopwith DC. Atmospheric action as a factor in fatigue of metals. J Inst Met 1932b; 49: 92–112.
10. Guadladt HJ, Petit J. Stage II crack propagation of Al-Zn-Mg single crystals in dry and wet atmospheres. Scr Metall Mater 1991; 25: 2507–2512.10.1016/0956-716X(91)90058-9 ↗
11. Haigh BP. Experiments on the fatigue of brasses. J Inst Met 1917; 18: 55–86.
12. Henaff G, Marchal K, Petit J. On fatigue crack propagation enhancement by a gaseous atmosphere: experimental and theoritical aspects. Acta Metall Mater 1995; 43: 2931–2952.10.1016/0956-7151(95)00002-D ↗
13. Kirby BR, Beevers CJ. Slow fatigue crack growth and threshold behavior in air and vacuum of commercial aluminum alloys. Fatigue Eng Mater Struct 1973; 1: 203–215.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00378.x ↗
14. Kujawski D, Lin H-C. A general equation for Kop and KPR description. Eng Fract Mech 2008; 75: 3244–3248.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.01.014 ↗
15. Lang M. A model for fatigue crack growth part II modeling. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2000; 23: 603–617.10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00298.x ↗
16. Lee EU, Vasudevan AK, Glinka G. Environmental effects on low cycle fatigue of 2024-T351 and 7075-T651 aluminum alloys. Int J Fatigue 2009; 31: 1938–1942.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.012 ↗
17. Lee H, Kim Y, Jeong Y, Kim S. Effects of testing variables on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of Al 2024-T351. Corros Sci 2012; 55: 10–19.10.1016/j.corsci.2011.09.021 ↗
18. Lu Z, Liu Y. Small time scale fatigue crack growth analysis. Int J Fatigue 2010; 32: 1306–1321.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.010 ↗
19. Pao PS, Gao M, Wei RP. Environmentally assisted fatigue-crack growth in 7075 and 7050 aluminum. Scripta Metall 1985; 19: 265–270.10.1016/0036-9748(85)90310-2 ↗
20. Parkins, RN. Slow Strain Rate Testing – 25 Years Experience. In: Kane RD (ed.), Slow strain rate testing for the evaluation of environmentally induced cracking: research and engineering applications. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 1993.10.1520/STP12751S ↗
21. Petit J, Henaff G, Sarrazin-Baudoux C. Fatigue crack growth thresholds, endurance limits, and design. ASTM STP 2000; 1372: 3–30.10.1520/STP13423S ↗
22. Petit J, Henaff G, Sarrazin-Baudoux C. Environmentally-assisted fatigue in the gaseous atmosphere. Compr Struct Integr 2003; 6: 211–280.10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/06130-9 ↗
23. Pippan R, Zelger C, Gach E, Bichler C, Weinhandl H. On the mechanism of fatigue crack propagation in ductile metallic materials. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 2010; 34: 1–16.10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01484.x ↗
24. Rice JR. Mechanics of crack tip deformation and extension by fatigue. In: Fatigue crack propagation ser. 415. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing Materials, 1967: 247–309.10.1520/STP47234S ↗
25. Sadananda K, Vasudevan AK. Fatigue crack growth mechanisms in steels. Int J Fatigue 2003; 25: 899–914.10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00128-2 ↗
26. Salvik DC. Environmental fatigue crack growth and microscopic damage mechanisms in AA2090 [PhD dissertation]. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 1993.
27. Standard ASTM G129-00. Standard practice for slow strain rate testing to evaluate the susceptibility of metallic materials to environmentally assisted cracking. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2006.
28. Tesch A, Pippan R, Doker H. New testing procedure to determine da/dN-ΔK curves at different, constant R-values using single specimen. Int J Fatigue 2007; 29: 1220–1228.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.022 ↗
29. Vasudevan AK, Sadananda K. A unified framework for fatigue crack growth. Fatigue 1996; 96: 375–380.
30. Vasudevan AK, Sadananda K. Classification of environmentally assisted fatigue crack growth behavior. Int J Fatigue 2009; 31: 1696–1708.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.019 ↗
31. Wadsworth NJ. The influence of atmospheric corrosion on the fatigue limit of iron 0.5% carbon. Phil Mag 1961; 6: 397.10.1080/14786436108235893 ↗
32. Wei RP, Gangloff RP. Environmentally assisted crack growth in structural alloys: perspectives and new directions. In: Wei RP, Gangloff RP, editors. Fracture mechanics: perspectives and directions (20th Symp.), ASTM STP. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1989; 233–264.10.1520/STP18827S ↗
33. Willenborg J, Engle R, Wood H. A crack growth retardation model using an effective stress concept. Dayton, OH: Wright Patterson Air Force Base, 1971. Report AFFEL-TM-71-1-FBR.10.21236/ADA956517 ↗
34. Yuen A, Hopkins SW, Levernt GR, Rau CA. Correlations between fracture surface appearance and fracture mechanics parameters for stage II fatigue crack propagation in Ti-6Al-4V. Metall Trans 1974; 5: 1833–1842.10.1007/BF02644148 ↗