Effect of pH on the degradation kinetics of a Mg–0.8Ca alloy for orthopedic implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract One of the promising applications of magnesium and magnesium alloys is their use as biodegradable implants in biomedical applications. The pH around an orthopedic implant greatly affects the degradation kinetics of biodegradable Mg–Ca alloys. At the location of a fracture, local pH changes, and this has to be considered in the optimization of implant materials. In this study, the effect of the pH of a physiological buffer on degradation of a Mg–0.8Ca alloy was studied. The pH of Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) was adjusted to 1.8, 5.3 and 8.1. Degradation of a Mg–0.8Ca implant was tested using immersion test and electrochemical techniques. Immersion tests revealed an initial weight gain for all samples followed by weight loss at extended immersion time. Weight gain was highest at acidic pH (1.8) and lowest at alkaline pH (8.1). This was in agreement with results from electrochemical polarization tests where the degradation rate was highest (7.29 ± 2.2 mm/year) at pH 1.8 and lowest (0.31 ± 0.06 mm/year) in alkaline medium of pH 8.1. The pH of all HBSS buffers except the most acidic (pH 1.8) reached a steady state of ∼pH 10 at the end of the two-month immersion period, independent of the initial pH of the solution. Corrosion products formed on the sample surfaces were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD), revealing the formation of magnesium and calcium phosphates with distinct morphologies that were different for each of the pH conditions. Thus, pH of physiological buffers has a significant effect on the degradation and corrosion of Mg–Ca alloys used for biomedical applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Materials Engineering Department , German University in Cairo (GUC) , New Cairo , 11835 , Egypt
Department of Biochemistry , German University in Cairo (GUC) , New Cairo , 11835 , Egypt
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Bita, A.I., Antoniac, A., Cotrut, C., Vasile, E., Ciuca, I., Niculescu, M., and Antoniac, I. (2016). In vitro degradation and corrosion evaluation of Mg–Ca alloys for biomedical applications. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 18: 394–398.
2. Coelho, P.G. and Jimbo, R. (2014). Osseointegration of metallic devices: current trends based on implant hardware design. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 561: 99–108, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.033.10.1016/j.abb.2014.06.033 ↗
3. Cui, L.Y., Hu, Y., Zeng, R.C., Yang, Y.X., Sun, D.D., Li, S.Q., Zhang, F., and Han, E.H. (2017). New insights into the effect of tris-HCl and tris on corrosion of magnesium alloy in presence of bicarbonate, sulfate, hydrogen phosphate and dihydrogen phosphate ions. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 33: 971–986, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2017.01.005.10.1016/j.jmst.2017.01.005 ↗
4. Erdmann, N., Angrisani, N., Reifenrath, J., Lucas, A., Thorey, F., Bormann, D., and Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011). Biomechanical testing and degradation analysis of Mg–Ca0.8 alloy screws: a comparative in vivo study in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 7: 1421–1428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.031.10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.031 ↗
5. Guyton, A.C. and Hall, J.E. (2011). Textbook of medical physiology, 11th. ed. Elsevier Inc.: Philadelphia.
6. Harandi, S.E., Mirshahi, M., Koleini, S., Idris, M.H., Jafari, H., and Kadir, M.R.A. (2013). Effect of calcium content on the microstructure, hardness and in-vitro corrosion behavior of biodegradable Mg–Ca binary alloy. Mater. Res. 16: 11–18.10.1590/S1516-14392012005000151 ↗
7. Heakal, F.E.T. and Bakry, A.M. (2019). Electrochemical characterization of certain Mg–based alloys in artificial perspiration biofluid for consumer and industrial applications. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28: 4379–4392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04163-3.10.1007/s11665-019-04163-3 ↗
8. Johnson, I. and Liu, H. (2013). A study on factors affecting the degradation of magnesium and a magnesium-yttrium alloy for biomedical applications. PloS One 8: e65603, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065603.10.1371/journal.pone.0065603 ↗
9. Lee, J., Han, H., Han, K., Park, J., Jeon, H., and Ok, M. (2016). Long-term clinical study and multiscale analysis of in vivo biodegradation mechanism of Mg alloy. Natl. Acad. Proc. Sci. U.S.A. 113: 716–721, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1518238113.10.1073/pnas.1518238113 ↗
10. Makkar, P., Sarkar, S.K., Padalhin, A.R., Moon, B.G., Lee, Y.S., and Lee, B.T. (2018). In vitro and in vivo assessment of biomedical Mg–Ca alloys for bone implant applications. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 16: 126–136, https://doi.org/10.1177/2280800017750359.10.1177/2280800017750359 ↗
11. McCafferty, E. (2005). Validation of corrosion rates measured by the Tafel extrapolation method. Corrosion Sci. 47: 3202–3215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.046.10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.046 ↗
12. Mohamed, A., El-Aziz, A.M., and Breitinger, H.-G. (2019). Study of the degradation behavior and the biocompatibility of Mg–0.8Ca alloy for orthopedic implant applications. J. Magnes. Alloy 7: 249–257, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.02.007.10.1016/j.jma.2019.02.007 ↗
13. Ng, W.F., Chiu, K.Y., and Cheng, F.T. (2010). Effect of pH on the in vitro corrosion rate of magnesium degradable implant material. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 30: 898–903, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2010.04.003.10.1016/j.msec.2010.04.003 ↗
14. Pogorielov, M., Husak, E., Solodivnik, A., and Zhdanov, S. (2017). Magnesium-based biodegradable alloys: degradation, application, and alloying elements. Interv. Med. Appl. Sci. 9: 27–38, https://doi.org/10.1556/1646.9.2017.1.04.10.1556/1646.9.2017.1.04 ↗
15. Prasad, K., Bazaka, O., Chua, M., Rochford, M., Fedrick, L., Spoor, J., Symes, R., Tieppo, M., Collins, C., Cao, A., . (2017). Metallic Biomaterials: current challenges and opportunities. Materials 10: 884, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080884.10.3390/ma10080884 ↗
16. Radha, R., and Sreekanth, D. (2017). Insight of magnesium alloys and composites for orthopedic implant applications – a review. J. Magnes. Alloy 5: 286–312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2017.08.003.10.1016/j.jma.2017.08.003 ↗
17. Shaw, B.A. (2003). Corrosion Resistance of magnesium alloys. In: Cramer, S.D. and Covino, B.S. (Eds.), Corrosion: Fundamentals, testing, and protection, Vol. 13A, ASM Handbook. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, pp. 692–696.10.31399/asm.hb.v13a.a0003675 ↗
18. Song, Y.W., Shan, D.Y., and Han, E.H. (2007). Corrosion behaviors of electroless plating Ni-P coatings deposited on magnesium alloys in artificial sweat solution. Electrochim. Acta 53: 2009–2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.08.062.10.1016/j.electacta.2007.08.062 ↗
19. Thirumalaikumarasamy, D., Shanmugam, K., and Balasubramanian, V. (2014). Comparison of the corrosion behaviour of AZ31B magnesium alloy under immersion test and potentiodynamic polarization test in NaCl solution. J. Magnes. Alloy 2: 36–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2014.01.004.10.1016/j.jma.2014.01.004 ↗
20. Wan, Y., Xiong, G., Luo, H., He, F., Huang, Y., and Zhou, X. (2008). Preparation and characterization of a new biomedical magnesium-calcium alloy. Mater. Des. 29: 2034–2037, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.017.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.017 ↗
21. Zeng, R.-C., Chen, J., Ke, W., Han, E.-H., and Dietzel, W. (2007). pH value in simulated occluded corrosion cell for magnesium alloys. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 17: s194–197.