journal article·2024-12Open access

Effect of Composite Scanning Strategy on Forming Quality, Microstructure, and Tensile Properties of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Titanium Alloy

Changchun Zhang, Hua Lin, Dongmei Gong, Li Rong, Yanzhou Li, Liyi Jiang

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 24

Abstract

Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology offers significant advantages in manufacturing complex‐shaped titanium alloy components. Traditional scanning strategies, such as zigzag and island scanning, however, often fall short in fabricating parts with variable cross sections. To enhance the forming quality of components featuring combined thin‐walled and bulk structures, a composite scanning strategy is proposed that adapts to the local characteristics of parts. This novel approach is designed to employ both island and zigzag scanning within the same deposition layer, aiming to optimize the balance between porosity and stress distribution. Notably, with a feature transition distance of 4 mm and a scan line offset of 0.67 mm, the specimens achieve a tensile strength of 1311.0 MPa, a yield strength of 1103.0 MPa, and an elongation of 8.8%. This strategy leads to the optimization of defects and a transition in microstructure for combined structural features. These promising outcomes lay the foundation for the intelligent allocation of scanning strategies and the high‐quality formation of complex‐shaped, high‐strength titanium alloy parts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering West Anhui University Luan 237012 China

School of Mechanical Engineering Nanjing Institute of Technology Nanjing 211167 China

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.06110.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.061 ↗
2. Robinson J. · Addit. Manuf. · 2018 · 23 · 13
3. 10.1007/s12541-024-00967-z10.1007/s12541-024-00967-z ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.10310.1016/j.msea.2017.11.103 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00170-023-10900-910.1007/s00170-023-10900-9 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.12.17310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.12.173 ↗
7. 10.1557/s43578-022-00735-710.1557/s43578-022-00735-7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11736610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117366 ↗
9. 10.1080/17452759.2024.238330210.1080/17452759.2024.2383302 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10327510.1016/j.addma.2022.103275 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00170-021-06810-310.1007/s00170-021-06810-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.02210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.10.022 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2022.14455910.1016/j.msea.2022.144559 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10158510.1016/j.addma.2020.101585 ↗
15. 10.3390/met904038510.3390/met9040385 ↗
16. 10.1002/adem.20220049210.1002/adem.202200492 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10325610.1016/j.addma.2022.103256 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.01110.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.10.011 ↗
19. Zhao H. · ACM Trans. Graphic · 2016 · 35 · 100
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2024.14692510.1016/j.msea.2024.146925 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.00410.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.004 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.03810.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.038 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11661-002-0204-410.1007/s11661-002-0204-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10122110.1016/j.addma.2020.101221 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.11710.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.117 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11292610.1016/j.matdes.2024.112926 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.05310.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.053 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11023810.1016/j.matchar.2020.110238 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.11917210.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119172 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17360810.1016/j.jallcom.2024.173608 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10124910.1016/j.addma.2020.101249 ↗
32. Zhao J. · Addit. Manuf. · 2022 · 59 · 103151
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14139210.1016/j.msea.2021.141392 ↗