journal article·2020-10

Influence of Accumulated Strain on the Fracture Behavior of Low‐ and Medium‐Carbon Steels Processed by Equal‐Channel Angular Pressing

Natalia Koptseva, Yulia Efimova, Mikhail Chukin, Mikhail Baryshnikov

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 22· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, commercial ferritic–pearlitic unalloyed low‐carbon and medium‐carbon steel samples containing a machined U‐shaped notch are subjected to equal‐channel angular pressing (ECAP) under varying total strains. The impact toughnesses and fracture surface structures of these samples are assessed through Charpy impact testing and scanning electron microscopy. The given results show that during the first pass of ECAP, the impact toughness decreases sharply. However, as the total strain in the ECAP process increases, the impact strength increases to ≈60% of that in the initial coarse‐grained (hot‐rolled) state. In low‐carbon steel, the fracture mechanism changes from ductile to ductile–brittle and then to predominantly ductile. In medium‐carbon steel, the fracture mechanism varies from brittle to ductile–brittle. Moreover, the strength characteristics in the low‐carbon steel increase by 90%, whereas those in the medium‐carbon steel increase by 50%. The observed effect is explained by the intense structural refinement of the ferrite component due to the formation of shear bands and ultrafine grains, for which the volume percent increases with increasing strain.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Metallurgy, Mechanical Engineering and Materials Processing Institute Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University Magnitogorsk 455000 Russia

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Segal V. M. · 1994
2. 10.1007/s11837-000-0128-710.1007/s11837-000-0128-7 ↗
3. Valiev R. Z. · 2007
4. 10.1002/adem.20180031610.1002/adem.201800316 ↗
5. Chukin M. V. · Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University · 2009 · 26 · 64
6. Wang X.-G. · J. Iron Steel Res. · 2007 · 19 · 54
7. Dobatkin S. V. · Metal Sci. Heat Treat. · 2000 · 9 · 31
8. Yakovleva S. P. · Ind. lab. Diagn. Metal · 2008 · 74 · 50
9. 10.3103/S106782121903008810.3103/S1067821219030088 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.05910.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.059 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.acme.2018.02.01410.1016/j.acme.2018.02.014 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.02510.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.025 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.10.04010.1016/j.msea.2017.10.040 ↗
14. Hanamura Toshihiro · 201410.1007/978-4-431-54499-9 ↗
15. ThixometPro.Image Analysis System https://thixomet.ru/product/thixomet-pro/ (accessed: October 2019).
16. Chukin M. V. · C. I. S. Iron Steel Rev. · 2010 · 1 · 28
17. Goritsky V. M. · 2004
18. Fellous) J. · 1974
19. Klevtsov G. V. · 2007
20. Yasniy P. V. · Phys. Mesomech. · 2010 · 13 · 73
21. Chukin M. V. · Ferrous Metals · 2011 · 6 · 54
22. 10.3103/S096709121602006610.3103/S0967091216020066 ↗