journal article·2024-12Open access

Pentamode Structures Optimized by Machine Learning with Adaptive Sampling

Stefan Bronder, Anne Jung

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 26· Issue 24

Abstract

Pentamode structures, gain increasing interest as insulation or stealth material. The enhancements in computers and clusters make it possible to investigate those structures not only in theory but also with simulations. Their applicability to mechanical wave dampening is the main focus of the present work, which leads to a structure with good damping and enough strength as the goal. Therefore, a parametrized geometry based on the diamond lattice is examined within a design space. A factorial testing plan investigates the boundaries and gives first hints on the structure's behaviour under compressive and oscillatory loading and also reveals the necessity of a multi objective optimization. Feed‐forward neural networks are then trained to predict the material properties action and mass specific stiffness utilizing adaptive sampling in order to save time and computational cost. An optimization procedure to gain the structure with lowest mass, highest stiffness, and best damping capabilities, which means lowest action, is successfully implemented and yields the best compromise solution for an equally balanced optimization. This structure is then investigated by finite element simulations and confirms the optimization as well as the neural network training, thus being the best trade‐off of all optimization targets.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Protective Systems Helmut‐Schmidt‐University/University of the Federal Armed Forces Holstenhofweg 85 22043 Hamburg Germany

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C6MH00065G10.1039/C6MH00065G ↗
2. 10.1115/1.280474310.1115/1.2804743 ↗
3. 10.1016/0167-6636(94)00069-710.1016/0167-6636(94)00069-7 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-662-57504-810.1007/978-3-662-57504-8 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.470943610.1063/1.4709436 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.497756110.1063/1.4977561 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.483866310.1063/1.4838663 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms513010.1038/ncomms5130 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.eml.2021.10152610.1016/j.eml.2021.101526 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-6463/abe43e10.1088/1361-6463/abe43e ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1614505110.3390/ma16145051 ↗
12. Fabbrocino F. · Ing. Sismica · 2016 · 33 · 62
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11181610.1016/j.matdes.2023.111816 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10393110.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103931 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-021-26565-510.1038/s41467-021-26565-5 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.01510.1016/j.mechmat.2019.01.015 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20210064110.1002/adem.202100641 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.03210.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.032 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.06010.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.060 ↗
20. 10.1126/sciadv.aax932410.1126/sciadv.aax9324 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0247825910.1007/BF02478259 ↗
22. 10.1109/JRPROC.1960.28759810.1109/JRPROC.1960.287598 ↗
23. 10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.04510.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
25. Tibshirani R. J. · Monogr. Statist. Appl. Probab. · 1993 · 57 · 1
26. L.Berger H.Eoin M. J.Cardoso S.Ourselin inAnnual Conf. on Medical Image Understanding and Analysis Springer Berlin2018 pp.277–286.10.1007/978-3-319-95921-4_26 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41524-019-0153-810.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
28. 10.1109/TCPMT.2021.310289110.1109/TCPMT.2021.3102891 ↗
29. 10.1002/adem.20210081610.1002/adem.202100816 ↗
30. 10.1029/2012GL05438210.1029/2012GL054382 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.00110.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 ↗
32. Klambauer G. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2017 · 30 · 972
33. 10.1093/imamat/6.3.22210.1093/imamat/6.3.222 ↗
34. 10.1093/comjnl/13.3.31710.1093/comjnl/13.3.317 ↗
35. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0258249-610.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0258249-6 ↗
36. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0274029-X10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0274029-X ↗