Taguchi Optimization of Electrolytic Plasma Hardening Process Parameters on Ti‐6Al‐4V Alloy: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, the effects of electrolytic plasma treatment (EPT) on the hardness distribution, wear resistance, and surface morphologies of titanium alloy (Ti‐6Al‐4V) at three different thermal cycles (4‐5‐6 times) are investigated. The microstructure is controlled by heat temperature and modification times of thermal cycles depending on EPT processing parameters. A novel technique to modify Ti‐6Al‐4V alloy by the process of EPT successfully occurs. The results show that the phase transformation is shown as follows: fine α and β for the low thermal cycle → irregular martensite α′ for the high thermal cycle → complete zigzag martensite α′ for the max thermal cycle. The hardness is increased from 350 ± 10HV0.05 to 530 ± 10HV0.05 after the modification. Wear tests are conducted according to the Taguchi L9 (3^3) orthogonal array. Three parameters (load, sliding speed, and sample type) with three levels examine wear rate and coefficient of friction. Optimum levels are obtained by Taguchi analysis from the experimental results. In addition, an analysis of variance is performed to find the effectiveness of the parameters. The wear surfaces are analyzed by scanning electron microscope. After the analysis, the best result is obtained in five thermal cycles.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering Faculty of Engineering Sakarya University Sakarya 54187 Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Sakarya University Sakarya 54187 Turkey
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20150041910.1002/adem.201500419 ↗
2. 10.1023/A:100672030601710.1023/A:1006720306017 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.11310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.113 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16713010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167130 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.00610.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.17054010.1016/j.ijleo.2023.170540 ↗
7. 10.1088/1757-899X/156/1/01203110.1088/1757-899X/156/1/012031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.triboint.2022.10780710.1016/j.triboint.2022.107807 ↗
9. Belkin P. N. · ISSN Surf. Eng. Appl. Electrochem. · 2016 · 52 · 1068
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.09810.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.098 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12829510.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128295 ↗
12. Bayuomi I. M. · 2009
13. 10.1088/1757-899X/142/1/01202810.1088/1757-899X/142/1/012028 ↗
14. Ayday A. · Kov. Mater. · 2019 · 57 · 19
15. Mazhyn S. · Key Eng. Mater. · 2013 · 531 · 627
16. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.02.01910.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.02.019 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.01310.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.013 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10146310.1016/j.surfin.2021.101463 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12559310.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125593 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.00910.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.06.009 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12547410.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125474 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.03610.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.036 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12755910.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127559 ↗
24. 10.1080/02670844.2020.174121110.1080/02670844.2020.1741211 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10091210.1016/j.surfin.2020.100912 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10273110.1016/j.surfin.2023.102731 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.06.10110.1016/j.procir.2015.06.101 ↗
28. 10.1179/174329407X16946710.1179/174329407X169467 ↗
29. Barriobero-Vila P. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 268
30. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.05.00710.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.05.007 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12820210.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128202 ↗
32. Analysis of variance table for Fit General Linear Model - Minitab.https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/21/help-and-how-to/statistical-modeling/anova/how-to/fit-general-linear-model/interpret-the-results/all-statistics-and-graphs/analysis-of-variance-table/. (accessed: 27 July 2023).
33. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12695710.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126957 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.01010.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.10.010 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12713710.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127137 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.12894610.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128946 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10059710.1016/j.surfin.2020.100597 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.18610.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.186 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.03610.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.036 ↗
40. 10.1007/s00170-020-05572-810.1007/s00170-020-05572-8 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.wear.2021.20396210.1016/j.wear.2021.203962 ↗