journal article·2019-04

Effects of Strain Rate on Low‐Cycle Fatigue Behaviors of Fe–22Mn–0.6C TWIP Steel

Penghui Ma, Jie Shen, Shuai Liu, Qian Zhou, Leijie Zhao, Lihe Qian

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 21· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The influence of strain rate on low‐cycle fatigue (LCF) behavior of Fe–22Mn–0.6C twinning‐induced plasticity (TWIP) steel is investigated by conducting LCF tests. The LCF tests are performed at a strain amplitude of 0–1.4% with strain rates of 8 × 10−4 s−1, 2 × 10−3 s−1, 8 × 10−3 s−1, and 2 × 10−2 s−1. The corresponding fatigue fracture morphologies and microstructure are also investigated. The results indicate that the TWIP steel shows initial cyclic hardening and cyclic saturation and then cyclic softening until final fracture at all strain rates. In addition, the fatigue life decreases with increasing strain rate due to enhanced dynamic strain aging (DSA). Moreover, the generation of persistent slip bands (PSBs) at high strain rates is also favorable for crack nucleation and fatigue crack growth, which is one of the primary reasons that lead to the premature failure of the fatigue specimens. At all given testing conditions, the fracture morphologies occur in a transgranular fracture mode.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Mechanical and Equipment Engineering Hebei University of Engineering 056038 P. R. China

State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology Yanshan University 066004 P. R. China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/srin.20110032910.1002/srin.201100329 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.03210.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.032 ↗
3. Hofmann H. · 2005 · 73
4. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-210.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-2 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cossms.2011.04.00210.1016/j.cossms.2011.04.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.05510.1016/j.msea.2008.12.055 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.05.04410.1016/j.msea.2015.05.044 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-016-3431-910.1007/s11661-016-3431-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.03510.1016/j.msea.2014.03.035 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.06310.1016/j.msea.2004.08.063 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.03910.1016/j.msea.2009.03.039 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.00810.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.12.008 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.03310.1016/j.msea.2008.09.033 ↗
14. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.604-605.23910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.604-605.239 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.03310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.033 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00140-810.1016/S0921-5093(97)00140-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.013 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.021 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.33110.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.331 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.02510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.025 ↗
21. 10.1016/0001-6160(79)90130-510.1016/0001-6160(79)90130-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0167-6636(03)00033-410.1016/S0167-6636(03)00033-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00358-910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00358-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.00910.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.009 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10853-012-6925-x10.1007/s10853-012-6925-x ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0264833910.1007/BF02648339 ↗
27. Qian L. H. · J. Yanshan Univ · 2012 · 36 · 507
28. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.03710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.037 ↗
29. 10.1520/JTE10520J10.1520/JTE10520J ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.07810.1016/j.msea.2017.04.078 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.01310.1016/j.msea.2011.02.013 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00052-810.1016/S0142-1123(98)00052-8 ↗
33. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.02010.1016/j.msea.2013.07.020 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0275765610.1007/BF02757656 ↗