journal article·2023-04Open access

Influence of Hatch Strategy on Crystallographic Texture Evolution, Mechanical Anisotropy of Laser Beam Powder Bed Fused S316L Steel

Sabine C. Bodner, Kostyantin Hlushko, Kevin Kutleša, Juraj Todt, Oliver Renk, Michael Meindlhumer, Florian Resch, Marc-André Nielsen, Jozef Keckes, Jürgen Eckert

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 25· Issue 7

Abstract

The correlations between process conditions, microstructure, and mechanical properties of additively manufactured components are not fully understood yet. In this contribution, three different hatch strategies are used to fabricate rod‐like samples from S316L stainless steel, which are further investigated using synchrotron diffraction, optical microscopy, and tensile tests. The results indicate the presence of ⟨110⟩ biaxial and fiber textures, whose sharpness depends on the applied hatch strategy. Mechanical tests reveal a strong correlation of the samples’ response to the observed anisotropy in the plane perpendicular to the build direction. Even though the average yield and ultimate tensile strengths of around 475 and 500 MPa, respectively, do not differ significantly, the stress–strain behavior can be correlated with the observed in‐plane anisotropy. Particularly, twinning‐induced plasticity, a distinct increase of the work hardening rate at larger strains and elliptical necking are observed in some samples with biaxial (Goss) texture. These findings indicate that texture design by means of applying dedicated hatch strategies can be used to effectively tune the multiaxial deformation behavior of components produced by laser powder bed fusion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science Chair of Materials Physics Montanuniversität Leoben 8700 Leoben Austria

Austrian Academy of Sciences Erich Schmid Institute of Materials Science 8700 Leoben Austria

Resch GmbH 8421 Glojach Austria

Outstation at DESY Helmholtz-Zentrum hereon Gmbh 22607 Hamburg Germany

Funding

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft · Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie · Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft · Steirische Wirtschaftsförderungsgesellschaft · Standortagentur Tirol

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14148310.1016/j.msea.2021.141483 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14066010.1016/j.msea.2020.140660 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.04210.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.042 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10853-022-06990-710.1007/s10853-022-06990-7 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12595610.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125956 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10593010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105930 ↗
7. 10.3390/met1107107610.3390/met11071076 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.04010.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.040 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11837-018-3271-810.1007/s11837-018-3271-8 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11837-022-05206-210.1007/s11837-022-05206-2 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11663-013-9875-z10.1007/s11663-013-9875-z ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.01.10310.1016/j.msea.2018.01.103 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170-020-05510-810.1007/s00170-020-05510-8 ↗
14. 10.1007/s00170-014-5954-910.1007/s00170-014-5954-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13845510.1016/j.msea.2019.138455 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11639810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116398 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.02210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.022 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.12610.1016/j.msea.2017.11.126 ↗
19. 10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-011110.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0111 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00170-021-06810-310.1007/s00170-021-06810-3 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.772.5710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.772.57 ↗
22. 10.1088/1742-6596/425/20/20201210.1088/1742-6596/425/20/202012 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
24. Noyan I. C. · Mater. Res. Eng. · 1987 · 117
25. 10.1007/BF0133794810.1007/BF01337948 ↗
26. 10.1107/S002188981301953510.1107/S0021889813019535 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep2267010.1038/srep22670 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1108141510.3390/ma11081415 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.09910.1016/j.jmrt.2021.01.099 ↗
30. 10.3139/978344644505510.3139/9783446445055 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.07.08210.1016/j.msea.2017.07.082 ↗
32. Scherrer P. · Nachrichten von Der Gesellschaft Der Wissenschaften Zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse · 1918 · 2 · 98
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13984110.1016/j.msea.2020.139841 ↗
34. Grässel O. · J. Phys., IV · 1997 · 7 · 1
35. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-210.1016/S0749-6419(00)00015-2 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.00910.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.009 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmps.2013.08.00710.1016/j.jmps.2013.08.007 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41598-019-55492-110.1038/s41598-019-55492-1 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41427-018-0018-510.1038/s41427-018-0018-5 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.08.00610.1016/j.addma.2018.08.006 ↗
41. EOS GmbH · Materialdatenblatt EOS GmbH Electro Opt. Syst. · 2017 · 49 · 1
42. Sarafan S. · J. Manuf. Mater. Process. · 2022 · 6 · 30
43. 10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00090-510.1016/S0749-6419(00)00090-5 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11400210.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114002 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10231410.1016/j.addma.2021.102314 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10601510.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.106015 ↗