Enhanced Mechanical and Degradation Properties of Hollow Glass Microspheres/Mg Matrix Composites by Incorporating Copper Power for Degradable Downhole Tool Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, the effects of Cu addition on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and degradation behavior of the hollow glass microspheres/Mg alloy composites (HGM/MA) are investigated. The results indicate that with the Cu content increases from 0 to 2 wt.%, the grain size reduce from 17.89 ± 1.15 to 12.05 ± 0.85 μm, the compressive strength and Brinell hardness increase from 303 ± 5.5 MPa and 87.2 ± 2.5 HB to 381 ± 9.2 MPa and 119.8 ± 3.3 HB, increase by 25.7% and 37.4%, respectively. When the Cu content is less than 1 wt.%, the formed fine and dispersive Al2CuMg phase provides more galvanic‐corrosion sites, and promotes the exfoliation of the corrosion product layer during degradation process, thereby accelerating the degradation rate. While the excessive Cu addition (>1.5 wt.%) results in the formation of net‐like Al2CuMg phase, which can act as a corrosion barrier to hinder the further degradation of the composites. The composites with 3 wt.% Cu exhibits the highest degradation rate of 88.65 mg cm−2 h−1 in 3 wt.% KCl solution at 366 K, with a favorable ultimate compressive strength of 352 MPa, which is thought as an ideal candidate material for the degradable downhole tools.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering China University of Petroleum (East China) Qingdao 266580 China
School of Science Changchun University Changchun 130022 China
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.04.00510.1016/j.vacuum.2017.04.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15712510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157125 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jma.2019.11.01010.1016/j.jma.2019.11.010 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.03710.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.037 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.11.01910.1016/j.jngse.2017.11.019 ↗
6. 10.1002/maco.20201186510.1002/maco.202011865 ↗
7. Ji Z.K. · Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. · 2017 · 25 · 1115
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15519810.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155198 ↗
9. 10.1002/adem.20200130110.1002/adem.202001301 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jma.2020.03.01610.1016/j.jma.2020.03.016 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11661-015-3053-710.1007/s11661-015-3053-7 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep2737410.1038/srep27374 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.02410.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.024 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.10316310.1016/j.jngse.2020.103163 ↗
15. Ma H. · Adv. Mat. Res. · 2015 · 1096 · 109
16. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.06.03110.1016/j.commatsci.2014.06.031 ↗
17. 10.1002/adem.20200130110.1002/adem.202001301 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.10.02210.1016/j.jmst.2018.10.022 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.08910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.089 ↗