Piezoelectric Glass‐Fiber‐Reinforced Polymer Sensor for Structural Health Monitoring and Stiffness Sensing
Source abstract
Abstract
Strengthening and repairing infrastructure with fiber‐reinforced polymers while achieving low‐cost, real‐time monitoring of cracks in engineering structures is highly challenging. Herein, a piezoelectric glass‐fiber‐reinforced polymer (piezo‐GFRP) sensor is used to monitor the mechanical behavior of cement beams with cracks under cyclic bending. The output voltage and frequency of the sensor are shown to be effective feedback signals for determining the mechanical behavior. The thin piezo‐GFRP sensor shows sufficient piezoelectric sensitivity to monitor the slight variations in the mechanical behavior of the cement beams during the early stages of cracking. It is indicated in this result that such sensors have the potential for the multifunctional structural health monitoring of engineering structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Frontier Sciences for Advanced Environment Graduate School of Environmental Studies Tohoku University Sendai 980-8579 Japan
Technologies Development Department, Technologies Development Office IHI Aerospace Co.Ltd. Tomioka 370-2398 Japan
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.05910.1016/j.nanoen.2014.11.059 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10870510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108705 ↗
3. 10.1002/admt.20220065010.1002/admt.202200650 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10525110.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105251 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10810010.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108100 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10847610.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108476 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10859910.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108599 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.04810.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.048 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11070210.1016/j.tws.2023.110702 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10793410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107934 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01000-010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01000-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.02810.1016/j.renene.2015.01.028 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1003024710.3390/polym10030247 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.26410.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.264 ↗
15. Saadatmanesh H. · J. Struct. Eng. · 1991 · 117 · 26385
16. 10.2208/journalofjsce.4.1_21110.2208/journalofjsce.4.1_211 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.01810.1016/j.istruc.2022.06.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10913610.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109136 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sna.2015.11.03110.1016/j.sna.2015.11.031 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10618110.1016/j.ultras.2020.106181 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11617010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116170 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10468510.1016/j.autcon.2022.104685 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12376810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123768 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.09.00410.1016/j.jnlssr.2021.09.004 ↗
25. 10.1007/s13349-015-0143-610.1007/s13349-015-0143-6 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10758710.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107587 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10940810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109408 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10858810.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108588 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.10.01110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.10.011 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11433710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114337 ↗
32. 10.1111/jace.1804710.1111/jace.18047 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20130138010.1002/adma.201301380 ↗
34. 10.1002/adem.20190016910.1002/adem.201900169 ↗
35. Chodros T. G. · 1998
36. 10.1177/107754632096031210.1177/1077546320960312 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2021.10377410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2021.103774 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.03810.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.038 ↗
39. Rezaee M. · Shock Vib. · 2012 · 19 · 171