Additive Manufacturing of Hard Magnetic Passive Shims to Increase Field Homogeneity of a Halbach Magnet
Source abstract
Abstract
Obtaining a highly homogeneous magnetic field is desired for field‐controlled applications. For example, the resolution of magnetic analysis methods can be improved by generating a stronger and more homogeneous field over the region of interest (ROI). A set of 3D‐printed passive shims is fabricated using additive manufacturing to improve the magnetic field homogeneity of a Halbach magnet assembly. The feedstock is a custom acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)‐hard magnet composite filament filled with 60% wt. isotropic NdFeB. Additionally, a method for investigating the remanence is developed and validated. The result reveals a good agreement between the new method and existing measurement techniques for the remanence of permanent magnets. It is also shown that the additive manufacturing procedure has negligible effects on the magnetic properties. Performing a parametric study over a rectangular ROI, an optimized shim configuration is achieved. In the optimized and 3D‐printed configuration, the average norm of the magnetic flux density, Bnorm, is increased by 13% and, more importantly, a 43% increase in the magnetic uniformity is obtained. These results highlight the great potential of freeform manufacturing, namely, additive manufacturing, to tailor the properties of magnet structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Augmented Reality Applications · Anatomy and Medical Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage Technical University of Denmark DK-2800 Lyngby Denmark
SUBRA A/S Bygmarken 4 DK-3520 Farum Denmark
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TMAG.1973.106771410.1109/TMAG.1973.1067714 ↗
2. 10.1016/0029-554X(80)90094-410.1016/0029-554X(80)90094-4 ↗
3. D. L.Trumper M. E.Williams Halbach Arrays in Precision Motion Control Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL) Berkeley CA1995 https://doi.org/10.2172/88776.10.2172/88776 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nima.2018.04.01710.1016/j.nima.2018.04.017 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms592810.1038/ncomms5928 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.01510.1016/j.jmr.2005.04.015 ↗
7. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.275100110.1109/TMAG.2017.2751001 ↗
8. 10.1109/IAS.1993.29889710.1109/IAS.1993.298897 ↗
9. 10.1109/TIE.2011.216105810.1109/TIE.2011.2161058 ↗
10. 10.1109/TMAG.2017.265863410.1109/TMAG.2017.2658634 ↗
11. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83215710.1109/TMAG.2004.832157 ↗
12. 10.1109/TMAG.2008.200153610.1109/TMAG.2008.2001536 ↗
13. 10.3390/s1603036010.3390/s16030360 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.01910.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.019 ↗
15. 10.1089/3dp.2020.034010.1089/3dp.2020.0340 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16937110.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169371 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0463310.1021/acs.analchem.9b04633 ↗
18. 10.2528/PIERM0812240610.2528/PIERM08122406 ↗
19. J. V.McGinley V. C.Srivastava G. D.DeMeester US Patent 5 532 597 1996.
20. A.Jesmanowicz J. S.Hyde W. F.Punchard P. M.Starewicz US Patent 6 294 972 2001.
21. 10.1002/nbm.332810.1002/nbm.3328 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.171733810.1063/1.1717338 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.01.02010.1016/j.jmr.2007.01.020 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmr.2008.02.01110.1016/j.jmr.2008.02.011 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.02010.1016/j.jmr.2010.09.020 ↗
26. 10.1002/cmr.b.2001810.1002/cmr.b.20018 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep4081610.1038/srep40816 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41598-017-09864-010.1038/s41598-017-09864-0 ↗
29. 10.1109/20.87763710.1109/20.877637 ↗
30. M.Ortner in9th Int. Conf. on Sensing Technology (ICST) Auckland New Zealand2015 pp.359–364 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSensT.2015.7438423.10.1109/ICSensT.2015.7438423 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.03.02810.1016/j.jmmm.2006.03.028 ↗
32. 10.1109/TMAG.2005.84648010.1109/TMAG.2005.846480 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.499744110.1063/1.4997441 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmr.2017.04.00710.1016/j.jmr.2017.04.007 ↗
35. 10.1109/TMAG.2021.308243110.1109/TMAG.2021.3082431 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598-018-33059-w10.1038/s41598-018-33059-w ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20227029510.1002/adfm.202270295 ↗
38. M.Mckittrick D.Bauer D.Diamond M.Mckittrick U.S. Department of Energy Critical Materials Strategy US Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information Oak Ridge TN2011 https://doi.org/10.2172/1000846.10.2172/1000846 ↗
39. 10.1007/s11837-022-05156-910.1007/s11837-022-05156-9 ↗
40. 10.1080/17452759.2022.202852210.1080/17452759.2022.2028522 ↗
41. 10.1038/srep2609410.1038/srep26094 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20210277710.1002/adfm.202102777 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.496485610.1063/1.4964856 ↗
44. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab8de810.1088/1361-6463/ab8de8 ↗
45. 10.1109/JMEMS.2019.291021510.1109/JMEMS.2019.2910215 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11465-013-0248-810.1007/s11465-013-0248-8 ↗
47. 10.3390/ma1315331910.3390/ma13153319 ↗
48. Elementary Scattering Theory: For X-Ray and Neutron Users - D.S. Sivia - Google Books.https://books.google.dk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=j4IKOazVdnMC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=+Sivia+DS.+Elementary+Scattering+Theory:+For+X-Ray+and+Neutron+Users.+Oxford:+OUP +2011.&ots=T0I7FzZaRe&sig=NAyl0pXFQPN438U7pG7d5EUpcTY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=SiviaDS. Elementary Scattering Theory%3A For X-Ray and Neutron Users. Oxford%3A OUP%2C 2011.&f=false (accessed May 13 2022).
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.00110.1016/j.addma.2018.04.001 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.295253710.1063/1.2952537 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.482014110.1063/1.4820141 ↗