journal article·2022-03Open access

High Strain‐Rate Compression Experiments on Ni/Polyurethane Hybrid Metal Foams Using the Split‐Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique

Markus Felten, Michael Fries, Tomáš Fíla, Petr Zlámal, Jan Falta, Ondřej Jiroušek, Anne Jung

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 24· Issue 3

Abstract

Open‐cell metal foams are a versatile class of porous lightweight materials, which are predominantly used as kinetic energy absorbers in a wide scope of applications. Based on their bio‐inspired inhomogeneous 3D porous structure, they are capable to significantly reduce the mass of structural designs. Starting with a polyurethane (PU) template foam, the specimens in the present contribution are manufactured by an electrochemical nickel (Ni) deposition. This manufacturing process is beneficial regarding both the specimen design and the adjustment of mechanical properties correlated with the Ni‐coating thickness. Herein, the strain‐rate sensitivity of open‐cell Ni/PU hybrid metal foams is investigated by quasistatic compression tests and high‐velocity impact tests conducted with a conventional split‐Hopkinson pressure bar device.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Applied Mechanics‐Foams and Metamaterials Saarland University Campus A4.2 Saarbrücken 66123 Germany

Faculty of Transportation Sciences Department of Mechanics and Materials Czech Technical University in Prague Konviktská 20 Prague 1 120 00 Czech Republic

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0264554610.1007/BF02645546 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.01810.1016/j.actamat.2015.09.018 ↗
3. Banhart J. · 1998
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.031 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00419-014-0942-y10.1007/s00419-014-0942-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.01710.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.017 ↗
7. Ashby M. F. · 2000
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.09.00210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.09.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13976210.1016/j.msea.2020.139762 ↗
10. 10.1002/adem.20190158910.1002/adem.201901589 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14009610.1016/j.msea.2020.140096 ↗
12. 10.1016/0020-7403(84)90021-310.1016/0020-7403(84)90021-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/0734-743X(94)00061-Z10.1016/0734-743X(94)00061-Z ↗
14. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-010.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11661-005-0180-610.1007/s11661-005-0180-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00194-810.1016/S1044-5803(02)00194-8 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.01810.1016/j.mechmat.2005.05.018 ↗
19. Zhihua W. · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 54 · 83
20. 10.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-510.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
21. 10.1002/adem.20170007610.1002/adem.201700076 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.10.04310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.10.043 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.01110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.011 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.504487210.1063/1.5044872 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.24710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.247 ↗
26. GRAY G. T. · 2000 · 462
27. 10.1016/0022-5096(75)90008-310.1016/0022-5096(75)90008-3 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-1-4419-7982-710.1007/978-1-4419-7982-7 ↗
29. Gama B. A. · J. Mech. Phys. Solids. · 2004 · 57 · 223
30. 10.1007/BF0241038510.1007/BF02410385 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-610.1016/S0020-7403(00)00043-6 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.03010.1016/j.msea.2013.08.030 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.02010.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.020 ↗
34. 10.1002/pssb.20145171510.1002/pssb.201451715 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.1985.07030012910.1002/app.1985.070300129 ↗
36. 10.14311/APP.2018.18.007210.14311/APP.2018.18.0072 ↗