Applicability Analysis of Carbon Fiber Composite Materials for a Novel Lightweight Designing Lap Bar of Amusement Ride
Source abstract
Abstract
The machinery manufacturing industry, including amusement rides, has made progress in structural lightweight and increasingly using carbon fiber‐reinforced plastics (CFRP) to achieve modest weight savings. The lap bar, as a key force‐bearing component used to restrain passengers, bears the brunt of becoming an important direction for lightweight design. To address this issue, the study analyzes and calculates its stress and deformation based on finite element analysis, and the results show that the CFRP lap bar does not exhibit obvious strain concentration, expected to have a longer service life. On the basis of these studies, the CFRP lap is prepared, and it is found that this substitution leads to a reduction in weight of 66.7%. In addition, three groups of fatigue tests are used to simulate its running state under nuclear load and overload, and acoustic emission (AE) technology is used to monitor it. The results show that there is no obvious damage in the tests of three different stages, and the reliability is strong, which verifies that the selection of carbon fiber materials can meet the requirements of bumpers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute Beijing 100029 China
Non-destructive Testing Laboratory College of Quality and Technical Supervision Hebei University Baoding 071002 China
Key Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation for State Market Regulation 10024 China
Fantawild Hytechnology Inc. Shenzhen 518000 China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.18410.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.184 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.05310.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.053 ↗
3. 10.1007/s12239-020-0044-510.1007/s12239-020-0044-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2015.10.034 ↗
5. 10.4271/05-11-01-000310.4271/05-11-01-0003 ↗
6. Chen Y. Z. · Cailiao Gongcheng-J. Mater. Eng. · 2020 · 48 · 36
7. 10.1080/09243046.2013.86866410.1080/09243046.2013.868664 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10443-012-9287-210.1007/s10443-012-9287-2 ↗
9. 10.1784/insi.2022.64.1.1210.1784/insi.2022.64.1.12 ↗
10. Liu K. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 2020 · 239 · 106975
11. Wang Z. G. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 2022 · 273
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11365910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113659 ↗
13. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69812210.1080/01694243.2012.698122 ↗
14. 10.1080/01694243.2015.106700310.1080/01694243.2015.1067003 ↗
15. 10.1080/01694243.2021.191120510.1080/01694243.2021.1911205 ↗
16. 10.1177/002199831877943010.1177/0021998318779430 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.06.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2004.06.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.05.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.00110.1016/j.ymssp.2014.08.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0963-8695(03)00068-910.1016/S0963-8695(03)00068-9 ↗
22. 10.1177/073168441770275010.1177/0731684417702750 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.05710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.057 ↗
24. 10.4025/actascitechnol.v42i1.4589910.4025/actascitechnol.v42i1.45899 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.055 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.02.03210.1016/j.tws.2019.02.032 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10443-021-09974-z10.1007/s10443-021-09974-z ↗
28. 10.1007/s10443-021-09867-110.1007/s10443-021-09867-1 ↗