On the Mechanism of Formation of Bimodal Grain Structure in Al–4.5Mg–0.7Sc–0.3Zr Alloy Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Scalmalloy is an Al–Mg alloy with additions of Sc and Zr originally developed as a high‐strength aluminum alloy with σ0.2 ≥ 450 MPa for aerospace industry. It is now well understood that the alloy is amendable for processing by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). However, the mechanism of formation of the equiaxed‐columnar bimodal grain structure during LPBF is not ascertained yet, fully. Herein, this gap is addressed with special focus on the distributions of critical elements such as Sc and various particles that form during LBPF. It is found that strong and weak segregation of Mg and Sc, respectively, occurs in the final solidification areas of the fine‐ and equiaxed‐grain regions. The coarser and columnar grain regions show weak segregation of Mg and no Sc segregation. A priori knowledge on the Al–Sc eutectic reaction, its dependence on cooling rates, and the well‐known thermal and solidification conditions related to the track location during LPBF is used to ascertain the mechanism of formation of the bimodal grain structure. The mechanism suggested is substantiated by the location‐dependent elemental distributions and the various particles that are observed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Auckland University of Technology Auckland 1010 New Zeland
Department of Mining & Metallurgical Engineering & Materials Science University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Bilbao 48013 Spain
SGIker Advanced Research Facilities University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU Donostia-San Sebastian 20018 Spain
AZTERLAN Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA) Durango 48200 Spain
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Kusoglu I. M. · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 36 · 101489
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11077910.1016/j.matdes.2022.110779 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.04710.1016/j.phpro.2011.03.047 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.05710.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.057 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.04010.1016/j.matdes.2016.11.040 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.08910.1016/j.msea.2017.06.089 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.05310.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.053 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.12.01110.1016/j.addma.2017.12.011 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.10.021 ↗
10. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00050-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00050-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.07.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.04910.1016/j.msea.2018.06.049 ↗
13. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab5bea10.1088/2053-1591/ab5bea ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15242210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152422 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14188910.1016/j.msea.2021.141889 ↗
16. 10.3390/met1104055510.3390/met11040555 ↗
17. Wang Z. · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 34 · 101260
18. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.06910.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.069 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11405210.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114052 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11206810.1016/j.matchar.2022.112068 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14251610.1016/j.msea.2021.142516 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11254910.1016/j.matchar.2022.112549 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11097610.1016/j.matdes.2022.110976 ↗
24. 10.1080/17452759.2022.212588010.1080/17452759.2022.2125880 ↗
25. Bayoumy D. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023
26. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.11427710.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114277 ↗
27. 10.1016/0921-5093(94)90162-710.1016/0921-5093(94)90162-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00257-210.1016/S1359-6454(98)00257-2 ↗
29. Toropova L. S. · 1998 · 14
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.03210.1016/j.addma.2018.05.032 ↗
31. 10.1007/s13632-020-00659-w10.1007/s13632-020-00659-w ↗