Influence of Ultrasonic Melt Treatment on Ni‐Containing Intermetallic Phases in Al–Si Piston Alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of ultrasonic melt treatment (USMT) at different ultrasonic powers (0, 900, 2400, and 3000 W) on the morphology and chemical composition of Ni‐containing intermetallic phases (T‐Al9FeNi and δ‐Al3CuNi phases) in an Al‐11.5Si‐4Cu‐2Ni‐1Mg‐0.45Fe (wt%) piston alloy is investigated. The morphological characterization reveals that the USMT not only decrease the size of the T‐Al9FeNi and δ‐Al3CuNi phases but also change the morphology of T‐Al9FeNi from skeleton‐ to block‐shaped. The block‐shaped T‐Al9FeNi contributes the most to the high‐temperature properties because this morphology is beneficial in the formation of semi‐continuous network structures. The chemical composition of T and δ phases is analyzed. The Cu → Fe in the T phase and Ni ↔ Cu in the δ phase existing in the examined alloys are estimated. With increasing the ultrasonic power from 0 to 3000 W, the ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation are increased from 98.46 to 124.57 MPa, 82.4 to 101.87 MPa, and 2.95% to 5.12%, respectively, at 350 °C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shaanxi Province Engineering Research Centre of Aluminium/Magniesum Light Alloy and Composites School of Materials and Chemical Engineering Xi'an Technological University Xi'an 710021 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.04010.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.040 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00157-910.1016/S0142-1123(03)00157-9 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.06.01110.1016/j.jmst.2017.06.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.04110.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.041 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11661-011-0764-210.1007/s11661-011-0764-2 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.03910.1016/j.msea.2009.07.039 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.09.01010.1016/j.matdes.2006.09.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.07310.1016/j.msea.2010.07.073 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.00310.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.11410.1016/j.msea.2017.08.114 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.05.08710.1016/j.msea.2016.05.087 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.01810.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.018 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.09.03510.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.09.035 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.02.09110.1016/j.jallcom.2008.02.091 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.14510.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.145 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.07.07310.1016/j.msea.2010.07.073 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.01010.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.010 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.05110.1016/j.jmst.2018.09.051 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.10.02510.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.10.025 ↗
20. Guo Y. C. · Chin. J. Rare Met. · 2018 · 42 · 713
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.08110.1016/j.msea.2012.05.081 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.12.02810.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.12.028 ↗