Corrosion resistance of commonly used plumbing materials for water distribution systems exposed to disinfection treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the corrosion resistance of commonly used plumbing materials was evaluated when three disinfection treatments were applied in hot water distribution systems. In particular copper, brass, stainless steel and galvanised steel were tested in environments containing monochloramine, chlorine dioxide and hydrogen peroxide disinfectants under real field conditions for a long period of time (1 year), in order to evaluate the effect of free corrosion on the metal specimens; chlorinated polyvinylchloride (CPVC) was tested in the same environments in order to evaluate the degradation of the mechanical properties of plastic specimens. The results obtained enabled us to rank the metallic materials corrosion resistance against disinfectants in decreasing order, as follows: stainless steel, copper and copper-based alloys, galvanised steel. CPVC samples proved to be extremely stable in all of the disinfectants investigated, maintaining the same compression behaviour of the pipes aged with untreated water after 12 months of exposure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Treatment and Disinfection · Water Systems and Optimization · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering ‘Enzo Ferrari’, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1099/jmm.0.075713-010.1099/jmm.0.075713-0 ↗
2. 10.3390/pathogens402037310.3390/pathogens4020373 ↗
3. 10.1086/65793410.1086/657934 ↗
4. Borella P · Ann Ig · 2016 · 28 · 98
5. 10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.05410.1016/j.watres.2007.07.054 ↗
6. 10.2175/106143014X1397503552498910.2175/106143014X13975035524989 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.03210.1016/j.watres.2016.01.032 ↗
8. 10.1128/AEM.03873-1510.1128/AEM.03873-15 ↗
9. 10.2166/aqua.2004.003510.2166/aqua.2004.0035 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.00210.1016/j.jhin.2011.03.002 ↗
11. Gosar L · Mat Technol · 2011 · 45 · 639
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.000071210.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000712 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.06910.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.069 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.03510.1016/j.watres.2014.04.035 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.est.6b0561610.1021/acs.est.6b05616 ↗
16. 10.5006/244210.5006/2442 ↗
17. 10.5006/293710.5006/2937 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.11410.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.114 ↗
19. 10.1515/corrrev-2017-012010.1515/corrrev-2017-0120 ↗
20. 10.5006/293910.5006/2939 ↗
21. 10.4038/cjs.v46i2.743410.4038/cjs.v46i2.7434 ↗
22. Campbell F. · 201210.31399/asm.tb.ffub.9781627083034 ↗
23. Zhang L · Journal of Safety and Environment · 2011 · 11 · 158
24. 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.02810.1016/j.watres.2006.11.028 ↗