Wall Microstructures of High Aspect Ratio Enabled by Near‐Field Electrospinning
Source abstract
Abstract
Near‐field electrospinning (NFES) holds the potential to develop into a versatile additive nanomanufacturing platform. However, the impact of a variety of processing variables remains unresolved.Herein, the effect of solvents used to prepare suitable solutions for 3D microstructuring by electrospinning is studied. 3D straight walls of stacked fibers are fabricated using a layer‐by‐layer fiber deposition approach. The effect of the choice of substrate material is also explored. The results show that a high vapor pressure, and a low dielectric constant of the solvent, as well as a high substrate conductivity facilitate improved stacking of fiber layers. Utilizing these conditions, 3D stacked walls of polyethylene oxide are fabricated, and a maximum aspect ratio of 191.7 ± 52.6, while using a chromium/gold substrate and dichloromethane/methanol as the solvent is achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Microstructure Technology Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen Germany
Institute for Organic Chemistry Ruprecht-Ksarls-Universität Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 270 69120 Heidelberg Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Cooper K. P. · 2019 · 1098213
2. 10.1557/jmr.2014.15910.1557/jmr.2014.159 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-020-14557-w10.1038/s41467-020-14557-w ↗
4. G.Zheng W.Li X.Wang H.Wang D.Sun L.Lin in2010 IEEE 5th Inter. Conf. on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems IEEE Piscataway NJ2010 pp.284–288.
5. 10.1002/adma.20030461710.1002/adma.200304617 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.02110.1016/j.addr.2007.04.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.042 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00609-410.1016/S0142-9612(03)00609-4 ↗
9. Islam M. · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2021 · 2101834
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.04.03910.1016/j.carbon.2006.04.039 ↗
11. 10.1021/la050178510.1021/la0501785 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl060270110.1021/nl0602701 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1278310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12783 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20150370510.1002/adfm.201503705 ↗
15. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/41/41550110.1088/0022-3727/43/41/415501 ↗
16. 10.1039/D0NR00031K10.1039/D0NR00031K ↗
17. 10.1038/s41378-019-0117-710.1038/s41378-019-0117-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.10.09410.1016/j.snb.2012.10.094 ↗
19. 10.1088/1674-4926/39/2/02400210.1088/1674-4926/39/2/024002 ↗
20. 10.1038/nmat197410.1038/nmat1974 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0416210.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04162 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.5b0890910.1021/acsami.5b08909 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10930410.1016/j.matdes.2020.109304 ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1307109710.3390/polym13071097 ↗
25. 10.1007/s12034-021-02359-910.1007/s12034-021-02359-9 ↗
26. 10.1016/0021-9797(87)90185-810.1016/0021-9797(87)90185-8 ↗
27. 10.1002/app.3545410.1002/app.35454 ↗
28. 10.2298/TSCI160928074L10.2298/TSCI160928074L ↗
29. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.06910.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.069 ↗
30. 10.1051/jphyslet:0198300440301210010.1051/jphyslet:01983004403012100 ↗
31. 10.1021/ie200922910.1021/ie2009229 ↗
32. J.Mohr T.Grund D.Kunka J.Kenntner J.Leuthold J.Meiser J.Schulz M.Walter AIP Conf. Proceedings Vol.1466 American Institute of Physics College Park MD2012 pp.41–50.10.1063/1.4742267 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.176270410.1063/1.1762704 ↗
34. 10.1002/app.4626510.1002/app.46265 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scient.2012.10.03710.1016/j.scient.2012.10.037 ↗
36. 10.3390/mi1103025510.3390/mi11030255 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.bios.2021.11311910.1016/j.bios.2021.113119 ↗
38. 10.1088/0957-4484/12/3/32910.1088/0957-4484/12/3/329 ↗
39. 10.6028/jres.080A.07110.6028/jres.080A.071 ↗
40. Safarov J. · Adv. Phys. Res. · 2019 · 1 · 14
41. 10.1002/polb.2022210.1002/polb.20222 ↗