journal article·2021-09

Using Radio‐Frequency Fields for Local Heating and Curing of Adhesive for Bonding Metals

Aniruddh Vashisth, Tyler J. Auvil, Daniel Sophiea, Sarah E. Mastroianni, Micah J. Green

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 23· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Lightweighting of metal structures can be achieved by replacing metallic fasteners with thermosetting adhesives. However, thermal curing of adhesives to bond metals in an oven can lead to distortions due to mismatched coefficients of thermal expansion, thereby compromising the structural integrity. Targeted heating of the adhesive can be utilized to minimize distortions and residual stresses in metal‐composite assembly. Herein, it is shown that rapid heating of carbon nanoparticles in the presence of radio‐frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields can be used to cure nanocomposite adhesives for bonding metal substrates selectively. Using the metal components of a structure as a part of an RF circuit, electric fields are generated through a carbon‐nanofiller loaded adhesive, which then volumetrically heats and cures. Comparable lap‐shear strengths and adhesive peel resistance are measured for RF‐ and oven‐cured composites. RF‐cured multimaterial bonding specimens (aluminum‐to‐steel) show minimal distortion, resulting in ≈590% higher fracture energies in peel mode as compared with oven‐cured specimens.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering Texas A&M University College Station TX 77843 USA

Mobility & Materials Division DuPont 1250 Harmon Rd. Auburn Hills MI 48326 USA

Funding

DuPont

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Heuss R. · 2012
2. N. H. T. S. Administration Corporate Average Fuel Economy.
3. Miller J. · 2017
4. Bihamta R. · 2017
5. Modi S. · 2017
6. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19688.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19688.x ↗
7. 10.1080/0021846980801224410.1080/00218469808012244 ↗
8. C.Amon J.Beuth H.Kirchner R.Merz F.Prinz K.Schmaltz L.Weiss inInt. Solid Freeform Fabrication Symp. Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium The University of Texas at Austin August 9–111993.
9. 10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00139-010.1016/S0045-7949(01)00139-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/0956-7151(91)90246-W10.1016/0956-7151(91)90246-W ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08798.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08798.x ↗
12. 10.1163/156856196X0043610.1163/156856196X00436 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.07.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.07.006 ↗
14. 10.1007/s40194-014-0195-y10.1007/s40194-014-0195-y ↗
15. Ma C. K. · Materials · 2018 · 11
16. 10.1126/sciadv.170026210.1126/sciadv.1700262 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.8b0626810.1021/acsami.8b06268 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9NR01600G10.1039/C9NR01600G ↗
19. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0153610.1021/acsanm.9b01536 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41598-019-52972-210.1038/s41598-019-52972-2 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.9b1497110.1021/acsami.9b14971 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10821110.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108211 ↗
23. 10.1049/PBPO025E10.1049/PBPO025E ↗
24. Anas M. · Appl. Mater. Today · 2021
25. 10.1039/a827213z10.1039/a827213z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.03810.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038 ↗
27. 10.1177/002199830403864710.1177/0021998304038647 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.00510.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.005 ↗
29. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.4310.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.43 ↗