journal article·2021-02Open access

Achieving Pseudo‐Ductile Behavior of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites via Interfacial Engineering

Gábor Szebényi, Balázs Magyar, Tibor Czigany

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 23· Issue 2

Abstract

This article presents an investigation of the properties of interfacial engineered carbon fiber (CF) reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) (PCL) is used as an interface engineering/interlayer material to modify the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) between the phases, with which it is aimed to increase the pseudo‐ductility of CFRPs. A stable crack propagation behavior can be achieved through interfacial engineering due to the locally weakened connection between the resin and the fiber reinforcement. Various grid patterns of PCL interfacial additive are designed, and 3D printed on the unidirectional (UD) CF (UDCF) surfaces by fused deposition modeling (FDM) and the UDCF is infiltrated with an amine‐cured epoxy (EP). The resulting composites are subjected to mechanical tests. In each case, the PCL‐rich interphase increases ductile pseudo‐behavior, and the type of grid affects the mechanical response.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Budapest University of Technology and Economics Muegyetem rkp. 3 H-1111 Budapest Hungary

MTA–BME Research Group for Composite Science and Technology Muegyetem rkp. 3 H-1111 Budapest Hungary

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.6710.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.67 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-034071920-6/50005-410.1016/B978-034071920-6/50005-4 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.020 ↗
4. 10.1590/S1516-1439200900040000410.1590/S1516-14392009000400004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2013.04.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.144 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.009 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1112247210.3390/ma11122472 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0072111210.1007/BF00721112 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.02410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.024 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.01610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.016 ↗
12. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90179-110.1016/0266-3538(94)90179-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.020 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10672410.1016/j.tws.2020.106724 ↗
15. 10.1177/002199831772713310.1177/0021998317727133 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.00610.1016/j.matdes.2018.07.006 ↗
17. Szebényi G. · Concept Feasibility · 2017 · 11 · 525
18. 10.1002/pssr.20130814910.1002/pssr.201308149 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.03810.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.038 ↗