Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Properties Improvement of AlZnMgCu Alloys Induced by a Novel Double Electroshocking Treatment
Source abstract
Abstract
Herein, a novel solution method of AlZnMgCu alloy using double electroshocking treatment (D‐EST) is proposed. Compared with the conventional solid solution treatment (SST) at 475 °C for 30 min, this method can provide more desirable results, although it only takes 10.2 s. Single tensile test results show that the ultimate strength and elongation after D‐EST followed by T6 aging are, respectively, increased by 2.6% and 6.8% relative to that of SST. In addition, the microstructure of the alloy after D‐EST and SST is characterized by the scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD). The experimental results reveal that D‐EST can give rise to more adequate dissolution of secondary phases especially intermetallic compounds and long rod‐shaped dispersion phase, finer grains, and fewer grain boundaries in the range of 5°–8°. The kinetic mechanism of D‐EST is interpreted from the point of view of electromigration and the nonuniform distribution of temperature on the microscale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hubei Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Automotive Components Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan 430070 China
Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Automotive Components Technology Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan 430070 China
School of Automotive Engineering Wuhan University of Technology Wuhan 430070 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.04.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.04.031 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.17310.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.173 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.030 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.aav708610.1126/science.aav7086 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.12.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.12.012 ↗
6. Guo F. B. · Rare Met. · 2017 · 7 · 1
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.00510.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.04410.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.044 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00597-110.1016/S0924-0136(03)00597-1 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.02410.1016/j.msea.2017.01.024 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.10.06410.1016/j.msea.2012.10.064 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.11.10810.1016/j.msea.2018.11.108 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.03610.1016/j.msea.2015.12.036 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.04810.1016/j.msea.2010.01.048 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10815310.1016/j.matdes.2019.108153 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.05.07110.1016/j.msea.2019.05.071 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.00310.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.04910.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.049 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.06.05510.1016/j.jallcom.2013.06.055 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00056-X10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00056-X ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0266425610.1007/BF02664256 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.01310.1016/j.matchar.2015.10.013 ↗
23. Jeon M. · Korean J. Met. Mater. · 1991 · 29 · 973
24. 10.1007/s10853-019-04065-810.1007/s10853-019-04065-8 ↗
25. Meyrick G. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2003 · 3 · 327
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.04410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.044 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00780-210.1016/S0921-5093(00)00780-2 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.04610.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.046 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.09110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.091 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0054229510.1007/BF00542295 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.06210.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.062 ↗
32. 10.1016/0001-6160(87)90001-010.1016/0001-6160(87)90001-0 ↗
33. 10.1023/A:102109580120510.1023/A:1021095801205 ↗
34. 10.1002/jemt.2322610.1002/jemt.23226 ↗
35. 10.3103/S106287380809003710.3103/S1062873808090037 ↗