Experimental Study on the Effect of Cooling Rate on the Secondary Phase in As‐Cast Mg–Gd–Y–Zr Alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of cooling rate on the composition, morphology, size, and volume fraction of the secondary phase in as‐cast Mg–Gd–Y–Zr alloy is investigated. In the study, a casting containing five steps with thickness of 10–50 mm is produced, in which cooling rate ranging from 2.6 to 11.0 K s−1 is created. The secondary phase is characterized using optical microscope (OM), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and electron probe micro‐analyzer (EPMA). The volume fraction of the secondary phase is determined using OM and quantitative metallographic analysis, and Vickers hardness test is conducted to verify the analysis results. The effect of the cooling rate on the volume fraction of the secondary phase is discussed in detail. The result shows that with the increase of the cooling rate, the size of the secondary phase decreases. The effect of the cooling rate on the volume fraction of the secondary phase is complicated somewhat. A comprehensive analysis on the experimental data shows that a critical cooling rate may exist, over which the volume fraction of the secondary phase decreases with the increase of the cooling rate, however under which the volume fraction increases with the increase of the cooling rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials Processing Technology (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China
Shanghai Spaceflight Precision Machinery Research Institute 1 Guide Rd, Songjiang District Shanghai 201600 China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Kojima Y. · Mater. Sci. Forum · 2003 · 3 · 419
2. 10.1023/A:100868241514110.1023/A:1008682415141 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11663-014-0208-710.1007/s11663-014-0208-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.04210.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.042 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.09010.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.090 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.03510.1016/j.jallcom.2011.12.035 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.05010.1016/j.jallcom.2012.02.050 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.04910.1016/j.msea.2014.06.049 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.11.04710.1016/j.msea.2015.11.047 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.08010.1016/j.msea.2016.11.080 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.12.03510.1016/j.msea.2004.12.035 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.06810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.068 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.08710.1016/j.msea.2012.03.087 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.04210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.042 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.12110.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.121 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.00910.1016/j.msea.2010.12.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.084 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.11210.1016/j.msea.2012.08.112 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.04110.1016/j.msea.2010.03.041 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.04.09010.1016/j.jallcom.2010.04.090 ↗
22. 10.1179/136404609X36750610.1179/136404609X367506 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.13610.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.136 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.01610.1016/j.msea.2012.11.016 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1875-5372(10)60134-810.1016/S1875-5372(10)60134-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.06.02910.1016/j.matchar.2016.06.029 ↗
27. 10.1179/174328408X27599110.1179/174328408X275991 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.169872810.1063/1.1698728 ↗
29. Brody H. D. · Trans. TMS‐AIME · 1966 · 236 · 615