Strengthening Nickel by In Situ Graphene Synthesis
Source abstract
Abstract
Owing to the superior strength and atomic thickness of graphene, it can in theory reinforce metals beyond the usual rule of mixtures bounds by constraining dislocations motion and strain localization at the grain boundaries. This unusual enhancement relies on the graphene's ability to conform to and wrap metal grains. This study experimentally probes the limits of this behavior and investigates the role of interface in designing superior graphene composites. Free‐standing nickel–multilayer graphene (Ni–MLG) nanomembranes are fabricated by in situ chemical vapor deposition. Using nanoindentation, elastic modulus (285.16 GPa), maximum stress (2.35 GPa), and toughness (1407.26 Jm−2) are measured, and these values exceed the rule of mixtures bounds. The multi‐frequency atomic force microscopy (AFM) is used to spatially map the elastic properties and topography of the MLG on Ni grain boundaries. This emerging characterization reveals that effective reinforcement is achieved when graphene conforms and bridges the grain texture. Nanoindentation and AFM confirm that these mechanisms are ineffective in non‐conformally attached Ni–MLG composites, which exhibit significantly weaker mechanical behavior. These results guide the design of effective graphene composites by highlighting the importance of nanoscale roughness and interfaces, and clearly demonstrate the superiority of composite processing routes based on in situ graphene synthesis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dr. S. Tawfick, K. Zhang, M. Poss, P. J. Chen Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign CU 61801 USA
Funding
Office of Naval Research
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0771910.1038/nature07719 ↗
3. Chang H. X. · Adv Funct Mater · 2013 · 23
4. 10.1002/adma.20130224010.1002/adma.201302240 ↗
5. 10.1021/nn103028d10.1021/nn103028d ↗
6. 10.1038/s41598-016-0002-710.1038/s41598-016-0002-7 ↗
7. 10.1080/02670836.2015.110401810.1080/02670836.2015.1104018 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20140121610.1002/adfm.201401216 ↗
9. 10.1021/nl801827v10.1021/nl801827v ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2011.3610.1038/nnano.2011.36 ↗
11. 10.1039/c3nr33560g10.1039/c3nr33560g ↗
12. 10.1126/science.112140110.1126/science.1121401 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.118238310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.2005.022010.1557/JMR.2005.0220 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matlet.2004.02.04410.1016/j.matlet.2004.02.044 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms478210.1038/ncomms4782 ↗
17. Li Z. · Nanotechnology · 2014 · 25 · 8
18. 10.1002/adma.20130249510.1002/adma.201302495 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0106710.1021/acsnano.5b01067 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.06310.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.063 ↗
21. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/23/00810.1088/0957-4484/17/23/008 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.05910.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.059 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms311410.1038/ncomms3114 ↗
24. McNerny D. Q. · Sci. Rep · 2014 · 4 · 910.1038/srep05049 ↗
25. Lee C. H. · Sci. Rep · 2013 · 3 · 6
26. 10.1021/nl901073g10.1021/nl901073g ↗
27. Childres I. · New Dev. Photon Mater. Res · 2013 · 1 · 20
28. 10.1002/adma.20090426410.1002/adma.200904264 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.05710.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.057 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0493910.1021/acsnano.5b04939 ↗
31. 10.1016/0020-7462(68)90004-810.1016/0020-7462(68)90004-8 ↗
32. 10.1115/1.182724610.1115/1.1827246 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0265291510.1007/BF02652915 ↗
34. 10.1080/0021846950800997710.1080/00218469508009977 ↗
35. COMSOL Structural Mechanics Module User's Guide Version 5.0.1.276 December17 2014.
36. 10.2514/3.467210.2514/3.4672 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0217310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02173 ↗
38. 10.1021/jz101146610.1021/jz1011466 ↗
39. 10.1038/nmat311510.1038/nmat3115 ↗
40. 10.1002/smll.20090148010.1002/smll.200901480 ↗
41. 10.1021/nn200319d10.1021/nn200319d ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.07610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.076102 ↗
43. M. A.Meyers K. K.Chawla Mechanical Behavior of Materials 2nd Edition2009 1.10.1017/CBO9780511810947 ↗
44. L. T. Drzal Presentation: Electrical Conductivity of Aligned Graphene Nanoplatelets from XGSciences http://xgsciences.com/library/material-safety-data-sheets/ 2013 April.
45. 10.3762/bjnano.7.8910.3762/bjnano.7.89 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.07110.1016/j.msea.2011.07.071 ↗
47. 10.1016/0921-5093(96)10253-710.1016/0921-5093(96)10253-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.00510.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.005 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.03810.1016/j.msea.2005.12.038 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.02310.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.023 ↗