Bio‐Mimicked Silica Architectures Capture Geometry, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties of Marine Diatoms
Source abstract
Abstract
The authors create life‐sized synthetic replicas of marine diatom coscinodiscus sp frustules out of cyclohexyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes (POSS). The authors demonstrate that these synthetic structures have biosilica‐like amorphous atomic‐level microstructure and mechanical attributes similar to those of a natural diatom. In situ beam bending and fracture experiments on micron‐sized excised sections of natural and synthetic diatoms reveal similarities in their mechanical properties: a Young's modulus of GPa and a fracture toughness of 0.78 ± 0.10 MPa m−1/2 for the synthetic materials; those of natural diatoms are GPa and MPa m−1/2, respectively. In situ single edge notched beam (SENB) bending fracture experiments reveal that fracture behavior of the natural and synthetic specimens is virtually indistinguishable and is characterized by the same brittle failure and crack‐arresting behavior enabled by the double‐wall geometry. Their fracture toughness is comparable to that of fully dense silica, which suggests that the natural diatoms’ frustule maintains its mechanical resilience even at <50% of the weight attained through multi‐scale architecture. The demonstrated ability to fabricate a synthetic hard biomaterial that is virtually indistinguishable from its natural counterpart while capturing its complex architecture, microstructure, and mechanical properties provides a powerful platform for investigating the specific role of each geometrical feature at every relevant length scale in the often sophisticated, multi‐scale hierarchical construct of hard biomaterials, and provides a robust pathway for property optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diatoms and Algae Research · Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Engineering and Applied Science California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125 USA
Funding
Institute for Collaborative Biotechnologies · US Army Research Office · Caltech's Discovery Funds
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/BF0127931610.1007/BF01279316 ↗
2. Stoermer E. · 2002 · 559
3. 10.1021/la062666y10.1021/la062666y ↗
4. Werner D. · 1977
5. 10.1080/0149045100370294110.1080/01490451003702941 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature0141610.1038/nature01416 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.protis.2006.09.00210.1016/j.protis.2006.09.002 ↗
8. 10.1166/jnn.2005.00610.1166/jnn.2005.006 ↗
9. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00887.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00887.x ↗
10. 10.1073/pnas.151979011310.1073/pnas.1519790113 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.150912011210.1073/pnas.1509120112 ↗
12. 10.1039/b901226e10.1039/b901226e ↗
13. 10.1021/nn900780310.1021/nn9007803 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
15. 10.3390/nano204044510.3390/nano2040445 ↗
16. 10.1142/202810.1142/2028 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat408910.1038/nmat4089 ↗
18. ASTM E1820‐17a Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 2017www.astm.org
19. 10.1557/jmr.2017.13310.1557/jmr.2017.133 ↗
20. 10.1520/STP35245S10.1520/STP35245S ↗
21. Baratta F. · 1987
22. 10.1073/pnas.203513110010.1073/pnas.2035131100 ↗
23. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.00110.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.001 ↗
25. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.710.1038/natrevmats.2016.7 ↗
26. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10442710.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.02610.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.026 ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat222110.1038/nmat2221 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.finel.2004.01.00310.1016/j.finel.2004.01.003 ↗
30. 10.4324/978020347787810.4324/9780203477878 ↗
31. Vogel S. · 2013
32. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.10510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.105 ↗
33. 10.1016/0021-9290(96)00001-210.1016/0021-9290(96)00001-2 ↗
34. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗