A New Horizon for Barreling Compression Test: Exponential Profile Modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
Exponential Profile Model (EPM) has been recently proposed to interpret barreling compression test's (BCT) data. A basic solution of EPM enables estimation of friction factor and to calculate distributions of strain rate (and strain) in the sample. These critical pre‐requisites allow to identify material's flow behavior and to indirectly measure static, dynamic, and meta‐dynamic recrystallization properties of the material based on the behavior. In this work, EPM's basic solution is employed in a fixed friction factor mode, the model is assessed and its potentials are outlined. The assessment includes comparing EPM's sample solutions with two reference solutions. The references are a non‐isothermal finite element model of BCT and the commonly used solution of the test; Cylindrical Profile Model (CPM). It is shown that despite variations of strain, strain rate, and temperature in Al1050 and AISI 304 stainless steel BCT samples, EPM's solutions agree reasonably well with the finite element solutions. This is particularly true for effective strains bellow 0.7 and friction factors bellow 0.2. It is concluded that EPM presented a far more reliable solution than CPM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Monash University Clayton VIC 3800 Australia
Institute of Frontier Materials, Deakin University GTP Building, 75 Pigdons Road Waurn ponds VIC 3216 Australia
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Sun H. · Adv. Eng. Mater · 2017 · 19
2. 10.1002/adem.20150036810.1002/adem.201500368 ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20140054110.1002/adem.201400541 ↗
4. 10.1002/adem.20120023110.1002/adem.201200231 ↗
5. 10.1002/adem.20130004510.1002/adem.201300045 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20080026810.1002/adem.200800268 ↗
7. Khoddam S. · 2017 · 165
8. 10.1016/S0301-679X(99)00055-910.1016/S0301-679X(99)00055-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0301-679X(01)00076-710.1016/S0301-679X(01)00076-7 ↗
10. Dieter G. E. · 2003
11. Rowe G. W. · 1979
12. 10.1017/CBO978051175544610.1017/CBO9780511755446 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-642-50241-510.1007/978-3-642-50241-5 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.04710.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.047 ↗
15. Kumar S. · 1985
16. 10.1007/s11661-009-0066-010.1007/s11661-009-0066-0 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.01210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.012 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00419-011-0566-410.1007/s00419-011-0566-4 ↗