Characterization of the Tensile Behavior of Expanded Polystyrene Foam as a Function of Density and Strain Rate
Source abstract
Abstract
Expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam is a material, frequently used in a range of applications for its good energy absorption, thermal insulation, durability, and acoustic absorption. In this wide range of applications, the material undergoes a variety of loads that can extend from static to dynamic. When it comes to crush applications, these loading profiles create the need of well‐defined compression and tensile properties for a range of densities and strain rates. Herein, static and dynamic tension tests are conducted on EPS foam dog‐bone samples for material characterization. The target of the study is to obtain stress–strain curves for a range of densities spreading from 60 to 120 g L−1. For the low‐strain rates, tensile testing machines are used, whereas for the high‐strain rates, a modified drop tower set‐up is used. The influence of the strain rate on the stress–strain behavior, the dynamic strength, Young's modulus, and energy absorption capacities for different foam densities is measured. Furthermore, the experimental results for each density are compared with the predictions of Avalle's model for crushable foams to evaluate the validity of the model. The quality of fit obtained between experimental and theoretical is between 70% and 97% depending on the strain rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Engineering KU Leuven De Nayerlaan 5 Sint-Katelijne Waver B-2860 Leuven Belgium
Department of Product Design LazerSport Co. Lamorierestraat 33 Antwerp 2018 Belgium
Departamento de Ingeniería de Diseño y Fabricación University of Zaragoza Pedro Cerbuna 12 Zaragoza 50009 Spain
Funding
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-910.1016/S0734-743X(00)00060-9 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00073-310.1016/S0142-9418(01)00073-3 ↗
3. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
4. 10.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-510.1016/0266-1144(94)90048-5 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.05.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0266-1144(97)00011-310.1016/S0266-1144(97)00011-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.05410.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.054 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.01210.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.012 ↗
9. 10.1002/pen.2004110.1002/pen.20041 ↗
10. 10.1177/0021955X740100030610.1177/0021955X7401000306 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12206-012-0509-110.1007/s12206-012-0509-1 ↗
12. B.Croop H.Lobo inProc. of 7th European LS-DYNA Conf. Salzburg2009 pp.1–6.
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.02410.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.024 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.008 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.00510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.005 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.302655610.1115/1.3026556 ↗
17. Gong F. Q. · Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. · 2010 · 29 · 2076
18. 10.1007/s11340-019-00510-610.1007/s11340-019-00510-6 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.00310.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.003 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.01410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.06.014 ↗
21. Hensley S. · Acta Bioeng. Biomech. · 2017 · 19 · 187
22. 10.1007/s11340-019-00521-310.1007/s11340-019-00521-3 ↗
23. ISO 1926 · 2009
24. ASTM D638-14 · 2014
25. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70235-210.1016/S1369-7021(10)70235-2 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.08.00610.1016/j.ijengsci.2017.08.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00030-710.1016/S0022-5096(99)00030-7 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_38410.1007/978-1-4020-6239-1_384 ↗
29. 10.1177/0021955X940300030110.1177/0021955X9403000301 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.04910.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.049 ↗