journal article·2021-10

Comparative Assessment of Ionic Liquid‐Based Soft Actuators Prepared by Film Casting Versus Direct Ink Writing

Daniela M. Correia, João C. Barbosa, João P. Serra, Rafael S. Pinto, Liliana C. Fernandes, Carmen R. Tubio, Senentxu Lanceros-Mendez, Carlos M. Costa

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 23· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The growing demand for improved performance, miniaturization and more environmental friendlier devices lead to the search for better materials and processing techniques. Ionic liquid‐polymer hybrid materials allow the development of advanced materials suitable for sensors and actuators compatible with additive manufacturing techniques, allowing reduced materials waste and the fabrication of materials in a variety of shapes. In this work, ionic liquids (ILs) blended with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) were prepared by doctor blade and direct ink writing. The selected ILs were 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium dicyanamide [Bmim][N(CN)2] and 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium thiocyanate [Bmim][SCN], based on their high conductivity value. The effects on microstructure, morphology, thermal, mechanical and electrochemical properties were evaluated, together with the actuator bending. It is shown that the printing process limits the PVDF spherulites growth, leading to lower degrees of crystallinity, which increase the ionic conductivity of the samples. The electromechanical measurements demonstrate the suitability of the developed samples to be applied as actuators, the highest displacement (7.5 mm) being obtained for [Bmim][N(CN)2]/PVDF for an applied voltage of 4 Vpp at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. The large bending (2%) is in line with the best results in the literature, confirming the suitability of printing technologies for the fabrication of high‐performance soft actuators.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Physics University of Minho 4710-053 Braga Portugal

Centre of Chemistry University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro 5000-801 Vila Real Portugal

BCMaterials Basque Center for Materials, Applications and Nanostructures UPV/EHU Science Park 48940 Leioa Spain

Ikerbasque Basque Foundation for Science 48013 Bilbao Spain

Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S) University of Minho 4710-053 Braga Portugal

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia · Agencia Estatal de Investigación · Eusko Jaurlaritza

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-009-2428-610.1007/s00170-009-2428-6 ↗
2. Costa P. · 2020
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.50510.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.505 ↗
4. 10.1080/17452759.2018.151801610.1080/17452759.2018.1518016 ↗
5. 10.1061/40476(299)2410.1061/40476(299)24 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1202027710.3390/ma12020277 ↗
7. 10.1177/1045389X1879895110.1177/1045389X18798951 ↗
8. 10.1088/1742-6596/744/1/01207710.1088/1742-6596/744/1/012077 ↗
9. 10.1039/c0jm00519c10.1039/c0jm00519c ↗
10. 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.05510.1016/j.memsci.2014.03.055 ↗
11. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819724-0.00005-710.1016/B978-0-12-819724-0.00005-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006 ↗
13. 10.1038/nprot.2017.15710.1038/nprot.2017.157 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tca.2013.08.00310.1016/j.tca.2013.08.003 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10853-011-5916-710.1007/s10853-011-5916-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.11.11710.1016/j.matlet.2011.11.117 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1221354510.3390/ma12213545 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.11.00310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.11.003 ↗
19. 10.1039/C9TC01428D10.1039/C9TC01428D ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20190973610.1002/adfm.201909736 ↗
21. 10.1039/C5GC02277K10.1039/C5GC02277K ↗
22. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.04910.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.049 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.05810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.058 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0798610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07986 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.03210.1016/j.polymer.2019.03.032 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0CP02436H10.1039/D0CP02436H ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-016-9756-310.1007/s10853-016-9756-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.03410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b0007410.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
31. 10.1021/je900789j10.1021/je900789j ↗
32. 10.1088/2058-8585/1/1/01500110.1088/2058-8585/1/1/015001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.01810.1016/j.polymer.2018.09.018 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00446-810.1016/S0032-3861(00)00446-8 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.01.00310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.01.003 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.05210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.10.052 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.molliq.2013.07.00910.1016/j.molliq.2013.07.009 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0086810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00868 ↗
39. Rinaldo G. · J. Polym. Sci. Part B: Polym. Phys. · 1994 · 32 · 859
40. 10.1002/app.3148810.1002/app.31488 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0041810.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00418 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.01810.1016/j.addma.2018.10.018 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.07.01210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.07.012 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.05.00810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.05.008 ↗
45. 10.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.10221110.1146/annurev.anchem.012809.102211 ↗
46. 10.1002/elan.20140053010.1002/elan.201400530 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.optmat.2009.08.01310.1016/j.optmat.2009.08.013 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1205118710.3390/polym12051187 ↗
49. 10.1021/ma202213810.1021/ma2022138 ↗
50. 10.1007/s10853-016-0193-010.1007/s10853-016-0193-0 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.09.01410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.09.014 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10751610.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107516 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10092810.1016/j.apmt.2020.100928 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.electacta.2008.10.00710.1016/j.electacta.2008.10.007 ↗