Near Superhydrophobic Carbon Nanotube Coatings Obtained via Electrophoretic Deposition on Low‐Alloy Steels
Source abstract
Abstract
Sucker rods are a key element in certain oil‐extraction processes as they link the motor group on the surface with the pumps located downhole. During the transport from the production site toward the extraction well, these components are prone to corrosion. A hydrophobic carbon nanotube (CNT) coating, deposited via electrophoretic deposition (EPD), is proposed as a protective layer, shielding the rods from harsh environmental conditions. Three different coating systems are considered and thoroughly characterized (depending on the additive that is used to deposit the CNT), namely, magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (Mg–Nit), triethylamine (TEA), and a duplex coating (DD). The latter presents an approach which combines the advantages of each additive, mechanical stability from Mg–Nit and strong hydrophobicity from TEA (near superhydrophobic). The former coatings are further processed to overcome their individual shortcomings, resulting in an increase in the coating's stability for TEA coating, as well as transforming the hydrophilic Mg–Nit surface into a hydrophobic surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Functional Materials Saarland University Campus D3.3 Saarbrücken 66123 Germany
Grupo de Ingeneria de Superficies FRCU Universidad Tecnologica Nacional Ing. Pereyra 676 Entre Ríos 3264 Argentina
New Technology Innovations Science Park 2 Saarbrücken 66123 Germany
Universitat des Saarlandes Naturwissenschaftlich-Technische Fakultat
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.21550210.1103/PhysRevLett.87.215502 ↗
3. 10.3390/ma1102029510.3390/ma11020295 ↗
4. 10.1007/3-540-39947-X_1410.1007/3-540-39947-X_14 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01167.x10.1111/j.2042-7158.2010.01167.x ↗
6. 10.1142/p08010.1142/p080 ↗
7. 10.1155/2013/67681510.1155/2013/676815 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.08.02510.1016/j.porgcoat.2018.08.025 ↗
9. 10.1088/2051-672X/aab14510.1088/2051-672X/aab145 ↗
10. 10.1007/978-3-211-99311-8_1010.1007/978-3-211-99311-8_10 ↗
11. Puetz J. · 2004
12. 10.1007/978-0-387-68023-110.1007/978-0-387-68023-1 ↗
13. 10.1007/s12648-009-0009-z10.1007/s12648-009-0009-z ↗
14. 10.1016/S0026-0576(01)80527-410.1016/S0026-0576(01)80527-4 ↗
15. 10.1557/PROC-121-71710.1557/PROC-121-717 ↗
16. Tucker R. C. · 1994
17. Smith M. F. · 2007
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.02110.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.021 ↗
19. Dickerson J. H. · 2011
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08929.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08929.x ↗
21. 10.1039/tf940350018610.1039/tf9403500186 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05402.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05402.x ↗
23. 10.1080/09506608.2020.183129910.1080/09506608.2020.1831299 ↗
24. Ma Y. · J. Mater. · 2018 · 4 · 108
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10794610.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107946 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.03710.1016/j.jcis.2006.10.037 ↗
27. 10.1021/la103587b10.1021/la103587b ↗
28. Reinert L. · R. Soc. Chem. Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 95149
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.507.6710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.507.67 ↗
30. R.Puyol S.Suarez inIEEE URUCON Montevideo IEEE Montevideo Uruguay2017 pp.1–4.
31. 10.1002/pssa.20143101810.1002/pssa.201431018 ↗
32. 10.1007/s12274-011-0169-y10.1007/s12274-011-0169-y ↗
33. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/25/25570710.1088/0957-4484/24/25/255707 ↗
34. 10.1016/0301-7516(86)90011-610.1016/0301-7516(86)90011-6 ↗