journal article·2015-01

Ultrasonic Welding of Bulk Carbon Nanotube Conductors

Christopher M. Schauerman, Jack Alvarenga, Jason Staub, Michael W. Forney, Ryan Foringer, Brian J. Landi

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 17· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Incorporation of bulk carbon nanotube (CNT) conductors into energy and data systems can require new methods of making a functional interface with low electrical contact resistance and high mechanical strength. Ultrasonic welding has been shown as a viable technique for mechanically and electrically bonding commercial CNT materials (CVD) to copper foil. The mechanical strength across the ultrasonic welds was measured via dynamic mechanical analysis with single lap welds exceeding 350 kPa. The electrical properties of the ultrasonically welded bulk CNT conductors (chemically doped with KAuBr4) to Cu were measured via 4‐point probe and show specific contact resistance between the CNTs and copper as low as 4.3 mΩ cm2. Thus, ultrasonic welding represents a mechanically robust method for making functional contacts between bulk CNTs and metallic interconnects with a low contact resistance. In addition, ultrasonic welding was successfully used to join two CNT ribbons end‐to‐end (breaking strength of single lap welds exceeding 200 kPa) demonstrating that it is also a viable technique for making larger dimension CNT materials from smaller components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanotechnology research and applications · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

NanoPower Research Laboratories Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY USA

Wyss Institute Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester NY USA

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01558-810.1016/S0039-6028(01)01558-8 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.350670310.1063/1.3506703 ↗
3. 10.1021/am201729g10.1021/am201729g ↗
4. Sci
5. 10.1126/science.122806110.1126/science.1228061 ↗
6. 10.1016/S1748-0132(08)70062-810.1016/S1748-0132(08)70062-8 ↗
7. 10.1039/c1nr10814j10.1039/c1nr10814j ↗
8. 10.1049/mnl.2012.050210.1049/mnl.2012.0502 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn101849410.1021/nn1018494 ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.2010.018410.1557/JMR.2010.0184 ↗
11. 10.1039/b904116h10.1039/b904116h ↗
12. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.09.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2012.09.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.10910.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.109 ↗
14. Forney M. W. · J. Intell. Commun. Res. Dev. · 2013 · 8 · 1
15. 10.1021/nl401776d10.1021/nl401776d ↗
16. Schauerman C. M. · 2013
17. J.Hemond R.Martens A.Loyd inElectrical Contacts (Holm) 2012 IEEE 58th Holm Conference on September 23–26 2012 pp. 1–8.10.1109/HOLM.2012.6336562 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.155890010.1063/1.1558900 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/9/01910.1088/0957-4484/17/9/019 ↗
20. 10.1021/nl073081710.1021/nl0730817 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.09.09210.1016/j.tsf.2008.09.092 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.271215210.1063/1.2712152 ↗
23. Schroder D. K. · 2006
24. 10.1149/1.240424010.1149/1.2404240 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.306781910.1063/1.3067819 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.349646510.1063/1.3496465 ↗