Effect of a cement-bentonite grout on AVM glass alteration and C-steel corrosion at nanometer scale
Source abstract
Abstract
Two experimental mockups were operated for one year at 70°C to study the corrosion of C-steel and alteration of AVM glass surrounded by Cox claystone. Only one system included cement-bentonite grout (CBG). Nanometer-scale analyses (TEM, XANES) examined the glass/C-steel interface to assess CBG's effects. The most notable difference was the presence of a nanometric magnetite layer on the C-steel surface in the CBG system. This layer, promoted by the slightly alkaline pH (8–10) solution influenced by CBG, could act as a passivating barrier, potentially mitigating corrosion, although corrosion rates showed no significant differences over one year. A 5 µm-thick sodium-depleted gel layer of disordered SiO 2 formed on AVM glass in both systems, with similar porosity (14–20 nm). The open porosity may limit the gel's protective capacity. However, glass alteration rates decreased over time due to passivation mechanism primarily driven by reduced diffusion through the gel layer, with chemical affinity playing a lesser role. Secondary phases (Si-Fe-O, Si-Mg-O) were detected only in the CBG system, likely originating from the claystone or CBG rather than the glass itself. These findings indicate that CBG had little effect on AVM glass alteration but may enhance long-term C-steel corrosion resistance through magnetite layer formation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LAPA-NIMBE
University of Montpellier
Centre de Recherche sur les Matériaux, les Ions et la Photonique (CIMAP), Université de Caen, CEA-CNRS, ENSICAEN, Caen cedex 5, France
Université Clermont Auvergne
Andra
EDF – R&D
Canadian Light Source
Funding
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Agence Nationale pour la Gestion des Déchets Radioactifs · Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. ANDRA. Dossier 2005 Argile: synthesis – evaluation of the feasibility of a geological repository in an argillaceous formation, collection les rapports. Chatenay- Malabry, France: ANDRA (agence nationale pour la gestion des déchets radioactifs), 2005.
2. Mosser-Ruck R, Bonnet J, Sterpenich J, et al. Chemical and mineralogical characterizations of a low-Ph cementitious material designed for the disposal cell of the high-level radioactive waste (HLW). SSRN Electron J 2022; 162: 107013.
3. 10.1002/maco.20201169610.1002/maco.202011696 ↗
4. 10.3390/min907042710.3390/min9070427 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.02410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.024 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.02310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.023 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.03.00210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.03.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00643-210.1016/S0022-3115(01)00643-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0883-2927(09)80060-710.1016/S0883-2927(09)80060-7 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0099010.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00990 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41529-021-00190-510.1038/s41529-021-00190-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.03.02810.1016/j.gca.2010.03.028 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-018-04511-210.1038/s41467-018-04511-2 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41529-018-0040-710.1038/s41529-018-0040-7 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1049110.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10491 ↗
16. 10.1038/nmat417210.1038/nmat4172 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.gca.2014.12.00910.1016/j.gca.2014.12.009 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12193810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121938 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.04410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.044 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.02510.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.025 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.gca.2018.08.00710.1016/j.gca.2018.08.007 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41529-020-00140-710.1038/s41529-020-00140-7 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.05010.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.11.050 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.02610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.026 ↗
25. 10.1080/1478422X.2017.130696210.1080/1478422X.2017.1306962 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.10810410.1016/j.corsci.2019.108104 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41529-021-00160-x10.1038/s41529-021-00160-x ↗
28. 10.1016/j.elspec.2019.07.00510.1016/j.elspec.2019.07.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.12.01610.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.12.016 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.11.00410.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.11.004 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.04.00910.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.04.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.10443610.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104436 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.04.01010.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.04.010 ↗
34. Mohanty C, Guo X, Kaya H, et al. Long-term interactive corrosion between international simple glass and stainless steel. npj Mater Degrad Degrad 2022; 66: 1–15.
35. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10010.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10010.x ↗
36. 10.1002/maco.20201176610.1002/maco.202011766 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.15525310.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.155253 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.02310.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.023 ↗
39. Narayanasamy S. “Influence of composition on vapor hydration of AVM nuclear glasses.” Ecole nationale supérieure Mines-Télécom Atlantique Bretagne Pays de la Loire 2019.
40. 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01705-110.1016/S0022-3115(02)01705-1 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.gca.2015.09.03310.1016/j.gca.2015.09.033 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.02110.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.021 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.08710.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.087 ↗
44. 10.1080/1478422X.2017.134441610.1080/1478422X.2017.1344416 ↗
45. 10.1039/C2JA30250K10.1039/C2JA30250K ↗
46. 10.1039/C7RA01600J10.1039/C7RA01600J ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.01910.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.019 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.00510.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.005 ↗
49. 10.1021/ie801819y10.1021/ie801819y ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.10.01510.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.10.015 ↗
51. 10.1038/nmat230110.1038/nmat2301 ↗
52. Michau N Bourbon X. “French Patent 3031 103. Coulis cimentaire pour remplissage d’un espace annulaire autour d’une alvéole de stockage de déchets radioactifs creusée dans un milieu argileux ” 2014.
53. 10.1016/j.gca.2009.07.02110.1016/j.gca.2009.07.021 ↗
54. Rajsiri S, Kempshall BW, Schwarz SM, et al. FIB damage in silicon: amorphization or redeposition? Microsc Soc Am 2002; 8: 50–51.
55. 10.1017/S143192760550779710.1017/S1431927605507797 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.clay.2012.02.01010.1016/j.clay.2012.02.010 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.nima.2007.08.08310.1016/j.nima.2007.08.083 ↗
58. 10.1107/S160057751500777810.1107/S1600577515007778 ↗
59. 10.1007/s00410-013-0883-410.1007/s00410-013-0883-4 ↗
60. 10.1021/es051363810.1021/es0513638 ↗
61. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00733-510.1016/S0022-3093(01)00733-5 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00658-510.1016/S0022-3093(01)00658-5 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.11.03810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.11.038 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.05.00710.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.05.007 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.gca.2016.10.00410.1016/j.gca.2016.10.004 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.18310.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.183 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11085210.1016/j.corsci.2022.110852 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.03310.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.033 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.00510.1016/j.jcp.2012.06.005 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.01.02710.1016/j.corsci.2019.01.027 ↗
71. 10.1080/1478422X.2017.130567510.1080/1478422X.2017.1305675 ↗
72. 10.1038/s41529-017-0025-y10.1038/s41529-017-0025-y ↗
73. 10.1007/BF0020247110.1007/BF00202471 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.00810.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.008 ↗
75. 10.1111/ijag.1205010.1111/ijag.12050 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.06510.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.065 ↗
77. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01123.x10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01123.x ↗
78. 10.1346/CCMN.1986.034040410.1346/CCMN.1986.0340404 ↗
79. 10.1346/CCMN.2010.058021210.1346/CCMN.2010.0580212 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.02710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.027 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.00810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.008 ↗
82. 10.1557/PROC-506-6310.1557/PROC-506-63 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.00410.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.004 ↗