journal article·2012-02

Reversible Magnetic Field Induced Strain in Ni2MnGa‐Polymer‐Composites

Sandra Kauffmann‐Weiss, Nils Scheerbaum, Jian Liu, Hansjörg Klauss, Ludwig Schultz, Edith Mäder, Rüdiger Häßler, Gert Heinrich, Oliver Gutfleisch

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 14· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Composite materials consisting of magnetic shape memory alloy particles and a polymer matrix combine the advantages of both material classes: the high achievable magnetic field induced strain (MFIS) of 6% of Ni‐Mn‐Ga with a ductile matrix. Engineering the particle‐matrix interface as well as matching stiffness of polymer matrix is of importance for achieving high reversible MFIS to use this material as actuator or damper. We investigated those properties for Ni50.9Mn27.1Ga22.0 and Ni50.3Mn24.6Ga25.1 polymer composites. Particles were produced by gently crushing melt‐extracted and subsequently annealed fibres. At room temperature, the Ni50.9Mn27.1Ga22.0 particles exhibit a 5M martensitic structure, while the Ni50.3Mn24.6Ga25.1 particles are austenitic. These particles were embedded into the polymer, either a stiff epoxy resin or a soft polyurethane. In response to an external applied magnetic field, the particles tend to relocate within the polyurethane due to its very low Young's modulus and magnetostatic interaction between particles. Slightly stiffer polymer matrices are advantageous for achieving controllable MFIS. In Ni50.9Mn27.1Ga22.0 epoxy composites, a MFIS of 0.1% was observed and was resettable by rotating the magnetic field by 90°. Furthermore, single fibre pull‐out tests indicated significant improvements of the interfacial properties when using silane coupling agent treated fibres.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.11763710.1063/1.117637 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.145807510.1063/1.1458075 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.130663510.1063/1.1306635 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.01710.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.017 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.027 ↗
6. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/7/07300210.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073002 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.185765310.1063/1.1857653 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.00810.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.008 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.04.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.003 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00494-110.1016/S1359-6462(98)00494-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.04010.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.040 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.151387510.1063/1.1513875 ↗
14. Heczko O. · 2009
15. Kreher W. · 198910.1515/9783112707135 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.03010.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.030 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00244-X10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00244-X ↗
18. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00292-910.1016/S0304-8853(99)00292-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmps.2006.12.00810.1016/j.jmps.2006.12.008 ↗
20. Meng H. · Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 96 · 102501
21. 10.1038/nature0302810.1038/nature03028 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.02010.1016/j.compscitech.2006.05.020 ↗