Effect of Meso‐Scale Geometry on Piezoelectric Performances of Additively Manufactured Flexible Polymer‐Pb(ZrxTi1−x)O3 Composites
Source abstract
Abstract
By integrating phase-field model and finite element calculations, we demonstrate that the additively manufactured 3-3 polymer-Pb(ZrxTi1-x)O3 composite can attain superb d33 and significantly outperform its 0–3, 1–3, and 2–2 counterparts in terms of hydrostatic figure of merit (HFOM), showing great potential in underwater acoustic applications. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA
Department of Mechanical Engineering Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS 39762 USA
Daniel J. Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles CA 90089 USA
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Iowa Iowa City IA 52242 USA
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C3EE42454E10.1039/C3EE42454E ↗
2. 10.1039/C4EE01759E10.1039/C4EE01759E ↗
3. b)H.Kim Y.Tadesse S.Priya in Energy Harvesting Technologies (Eds:S.Priya D. J.Inman) Springer Berlin Germany2009.
4. 10.1063/1.283641010.1063/1.2836410 ↗
5. 10.3390/s14081452610.3390/s140814526 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.04510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.045 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/25/8/08503910.1088/0964-1726/25/8/085039 ↗
8. 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.119362210.1109/TUFFC.2003.1193622 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.03610.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.036 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.02110.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.021 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.02210.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.022 ↗
12. 10.1080/17415977.2015.101748510.1080/17415977.2015.1017485 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmps.2016.03.02710.1016/j.jmps.2016.03.027 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.13204110.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
15. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00084-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00084-8 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02190.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02190.x ↗
17. 10.1063/1.33121110.1063/1.331211 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00023-910.1016/S0167-6636(97)00023-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00283-010.1016/S1359-6454(03)00283-0 ↗