journal article·2015-02Open access

On the Effect of the Mode of Connection between the Node and the Ligaments in Anti‐Tetrachiral Systems

Ruben Gatt, Jean Pierre Brincat, Keith M. Azzopardi, Luke Mizzi, Joseph N. Grima

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 17· Issue 2

Abstract

Chiral systems may exhibit auxetic behavior, i.e. they may have a negative Poisson's ratio. This particular property has led to their being studied extensively by several authors. A Finite Elements Study is presented here, investigating the mode of connection between the nodes and ligaments in the anti‐tetrachiral structure. The results show that the amount of gluing material used to attach the ligaments to the node will not affect the Poisson's ratio, but may have a large influence on the observed stiffness of the structure (Young's modulus). It is also shown that the stiffness of the glue will have a large effect on the mode of deformation of the chiral system. This change in mechanism was found to effect the stiffness of the structure but not its Poisson's ratios.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Metamaterials Unit Faculty of Science University of Malta Msida MSD 2080 Malta

Department of Chemistry Faculty of Science University of Malta Msida MSD 2080 Malta

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0022-3727/22/12/01110.1088/0022-3727/22/12/011 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.235.4792.103810.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
3. 10.1080/0026897870010176110.1080/00268978700101761 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.238.4826.551-a10.1126/science.238.4826.551-a ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014510.1557/JMR.1998.0145 ↗
6. 10.1016/0375-9601(89)90971-710.1016/0375-9601(89)90971-7 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0113017010.1007/BF01130170 ↗
8. 10.1038/354470a010.1038/354470a0 ↗
9. Wojciechowski K. W. · Mol. Phys. Rep. · 1994 · 6 · 71
10. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-210.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
12. 10.1134/1.113113710.1134/1.1131137 ↗
13. 10.1088/0305-4470/36/47/00510.1088/0305-4470/36/47/005 ↗
14. 10.1002/pssb.20046038710.1002/pssb.200460387 ↗
15. 10.1002/pssb.20057271310.1002/pssb.200572713 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.007 ↗
17. 10.1002/pssb.20057272110.1002/pssb.200572721 ↗
18. Grima J. N. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2008 · 245 · 551
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.008 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.022 ↗
22. 10.1115/1.400078510.1115/1.4000785 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.020 ↗
24. 10.1002/pssb.20124092510.1002/pssb.201240925 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmps.2012.06.00810.1016/j.jmps.2012.06.008 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.01210.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.012 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.00410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.12.004 ↗
28. 10.1098/rspa.2013.073410.1098/rspa.2013.0734 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.21910.1016/j.msea.2006.10.219 ↗
30. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/7/07501310.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075013 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.01710.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.017 ↗
32. G.Bergamasco G.Burriesci European Patent Bulletin2009 EP1803420B1.
33. 10.1002/pssb.20138424610.1002/pssb.201384246 ↗
34. 10.1002/pssb.20138425610.1002/pssb.201384256 ↗
35. Gere J. M. · 2009 · 1022
36. ANSYS® Academic Research. Release 12.0(http://www.ansys.com/).
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.035 ↗
38. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/8/08400910.1088/0964-1726/22/8/084009 ↗
39. Avallone E. A. · 1987
40. J. N.Grima Ph.D thesis University of Exeter United Kingdom 2000.