Microstructural Analysis of Electrochemical Coated Open‐Cell Metal Foams by EBSD and Nanoindentation
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal foams are a very interesting class of lightweight materials. Coating of open-cell metal foams via electrodeposition improves significantly the mechanical properties. In this connection, electrodeposition on metal foams leads to a totally different microstructure than normal electrodeposition on planar electrodes. The curvature of the struts induces an isotropic grain orientation which is responsible for isotropic material behavior. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Nanoporous metals and alloys · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Mechanics Saarland University 66123 Saarbrücken Germany
FR Experimentalphysik Saarland University 66123 Saarbrücken Germany
Department of Experimental Physics Saarland University 66123 Saarbrücken Germany
Department of Engineering Design and Materials Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim 7491 Norway
Department of Materials Science Saarland University 66123 Saarbrücken Germany
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/30310.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
2. Petch N. J. · J. Iron Steel Res. Int. · 1953 · 174 · 25
3. Jung A. · Int. J. Mater. Sci. · 2012 · 2 · 97
4. 10.1002/adem.20100019010.1002/adem.201000190 ↗
5. 10.1023/A:101496491667010.1023/A:1014964916670 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.01610.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.016 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01771.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01771.x ↗
8. 10.1016/0013-4686(83)85166-410.1016/0013-4686(83)85166-4 ↗
9. 10.1016/0376-4583(77)90047-410.1016/0376-4583(77)90047-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00004-410.1016/S0254-0584(02)00004-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/0013-4686(64)80060-810.1016/0013-4686(64)80060-8 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0061609310.1007/BF00616093 ↗
13. 10.1134/S102319350806012810.1134/S1023193508060128 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.03610.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.036 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.00910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-910.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 ↗
17. exSEM Laboratories (TSL). Draper UT. Software Version V4. 0 2004.
18. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
19. 10.1080/01411594.2012.72672910.1080/01411594.2012.726729 ↗
20. Koblischka‐Veneva A. · 2004 · 242