Novel Equations for Permeability and Elastic Modulus of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Scaffolds via Experimental and Numerical Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) scaffolds are crucial in bone tissue engineering due to their significant impact on permeability, wall shear stress, and elastic modulus. However, optimizing both permeability and mechanical performance poses a challenge. This study presents an experimental and numerical investigation of three TPMS architectures: Primitive (P), Diamond (D), and Gyroid (G), featuring uniform and graded porosity distributions across various pore sizes. Graded porosity enhances the scaffolds’ ability to mimic the natural heterogeneity of bone tissue, improving biological functionality and mechanical compatibility. Novel empirical equations predict scaffold permeability as a function of pore size and normalized elastic modulus based on porosity percentage, allowing efficient early‐stage design without extensive prototyping. Analyses reveal complex relationships between scaffold geometry, porosity, and biological responses, including osteogenic potential. Eighteen uniform scaffolds with pore sizes of 600, 800, and 1200 μm and three gradient scaffolds are evaluated. The Primitive structure exhibits the highest permeability, while both Primitive and Gyroid architectures show superior elastic moduli. Importantly, increased porosity does not always lead to decreased wall shear stress. The results are validated through microstructural analysis and in vivo data, reinforcing the robustness of the proposed models for optimizing TPMS scaffolds in bone tissue regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical Engineering Department K. N. Toosi University of Technology 7 Pardis St. Tehran 1991943344 Iran
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.bone.2021.11625610.1016/j.bone.2021.116256 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20201060910.1002/adfm.202010609 ↗
3. 10.3390/jfmk102015410.3390/jfmk1020154 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10676210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106762 ↗
5. He X. · J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 21 · 228080002311813
6. 10.1007/s13369-022-06836-z10.1007/s13369-022-06836-z ↗
7. 10.3390/jfb901002210.3390/jfb9010022 ↗
8. 10.1002/adem.20210046310.1002/adem.202100463 ↗
9. Zahra A. · Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. · 2021 · 29 · 4911
10. 10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.202204346110.1615/IntJMultCompEng.2022043461 ↗
11. 10.1007/s42242-019-00054-710.1007/s42242-019-00054-7 ↗
12. 10.1002/mame.20200048710.1002/mame.202000487 ↗
13. 10.1002/adem.20240138210.1002/adem.202401382 ↗
14. 10.3390/jfb1401002810.3390/jfb14010028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10393210.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103932 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.18610.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.186 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.10412410.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104124 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.01910.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.019 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11802110.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118021 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.02110.1016/j.actbio.2011.12.021 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.02110.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.021 ↗
22. B.Zeinali A.Mojra 2022 29th National and 7th International Iranian Conference on Biomedical Engineering (ICBME)2022 p58.10.1109/ICBME57741.2022.10052857 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.10827310.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.108273 ↗
24. 10.1186/s13036-021-00255-810.1186/s13036-021-00255-8 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11706-021-0558-410.1007/s11706-021-0558-4 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.10402410.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104024 ↗
27. Riches P. · Bioact. Mater. · 2018 · 3 · 278
28. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10702310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.107023 ↗
29. 10.3390/coatings1206083910.3390/coatings12060839 ↗
30. 10.3390/ma1208131310.3390/ma12081313 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.01210.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.012 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.16410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.164 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11080310.1016/j.matdes.2022.110803 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10487110.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104871 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20170570810.1002/adma.201705708 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.slast.2023.04.00410.1016/j.slast.2023.04.004 ↗
37. Kumar S. · Res. Square · 2022 · 1
38. 10.1007/s42452-019-1167-z10.1007/s42452-019-1167-z ↗
39. 10.3390/biomedicines1102042710.3390/biomedicines11020427 ↗
40. 10.1002/adem.20190052410.1002/adem.201900524 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10505210.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105052 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.10541810.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105418 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.01210.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.012 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13261610.1016/j.matlet.2022.132616 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11792310.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117923 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.12810.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.128 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.03510.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.035 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.00610.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.006 ↗
49. 10.1002/adem.20220095610.1002/adem.202200956 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11763810.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117638 ↗
51. 10.1089/ten.tea.2023.003310.1089/ten.tea.2023.0033 ↗
52. H.Qiao C.Zhang L.Yang 2023 7th Int. Conf. Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS)2023 pp.1–4.10.1109/ICTIS60134.2023.10243703 ↗
53. Yadav P. · NanoWorld J. · 2023 · 9 · S687
54. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.06.05110.1016/j.msec.2018.06.051 ↗
55. 10.1371/journal.pone.023847110.1371/journal.pone.0238471 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11284710.1016/j.tws.2024.112847 ↗
57. 10.1002/jbm.b.3533710.1002/jbm.b.35337 ↗
58. 10.1115/1.406757510.1115/1.4067575 ↗
59. 10.1007/s10237-015-0710-010.1007/s10237-015-0710-0 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10815110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108151 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041 ↗
62. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0140010.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01400 ↗
63. 10.3722/cadaps.2008.841-85410.3722/cadaps.2008.841-854 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10352010.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103520 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.03.00910.1016/j.medengphy.2012.03.009 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.06810.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.068 ↗
67. 10.3390/sym1009036110.3390/sym10090361 ↗
68. 10.1007/s12541-014-0516-510.1007/s12541-014-0516-5 ↗
69. 10.5772/152010.5772/1520 ↗
70. Soares A. A. · J. Appl. Fluid Mech. · 2021 · 14 · 1657
71. Guarino V. · J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. · 2007 · 5 · 149
72. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.10584810.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105848 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.00910.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.009 ↗
74. 10.1038/s41598-022-21479-810.1038/s41598-022-21479-8 ↗
75. Iwasaki N. · Jap. Orthop. Assoc. · 2014 · 19 · 699
76. 10.1186/s12967-016-1028-010.1186/s12967-016-1028-0 ↗
77. Hejmanowska B. · Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. · 2008 · 37 · 1329
78. 10.1177/204173142095654110.1177/2041731420956541 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.07.03010.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.07.030 ↗
80. 10.1080/0262666570949306210.1080/02626665709493062 ↗
81. Pritchard P. J. · 2010 · 583
82. Brunzel N. A. · Fund. Urine Body Fluid Anal. E-Book. · 2021
83. 10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y ↗