journal article·2022-05-19

Chemistry conditions and corrosion behaviour in simulated crevices of alloy steel

R. Puspalata, Sinu Chandran, S. Veena, T. V. Krishna Mohan

Publisher page

Abstract

Control and mitigating crevice corrosion demand a thorough understanding of the prevailing chemistry conditions inside the crevice. To match and predict the dynamics in chemistry conditions occurring inside a crevice appropriately, good crevice models necessitate extensive experimental data. This paper presents the accurate determination of the ionic species in the minute volume of crevice solution and redox potential measurements in fabricated simulated crevices of different dimensions/geometry in different stainless steel alloys. Crevice geometries fabricated from carbon steel (CS) 106 B and stainless steel (SS) 316 materials were exposed to varying water chemistry conditions in a static autoclave at high temperatures. The change in pH, conductivity, ionic concentrations, electrochemical potential and effectof corrosion inhibitors inside the crevice were monitored after exposure in an alkaline medium with and without chloride. Bulk solution pH showed a reduction in alkalinity, conductivity and enhancement in anion concentrations. About 58 times increase in Cl− was measured.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Water and Steam Chemistry Division, BARC Facilities, Kalpakkam, India

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Millett PJ, Fenton JM. A review of PWR steam generator crevice impurity concentration mechanisms. Proceedings of the Steam Generator Heat Exchange Conference; 1990; Toronto, Canada.
2. Fontana MG. · 1987
3. Sedriks AJ. · 1996
4. Etor A. · 2009
5. 10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00050-410.1016/S0010-938X(97)00050-4 ↗
6. 10.1179/00070599379915629910.1179/000705993799156299 ↗
7. 10.5006/1.328785010.5006/1.3287850 ↗
8. Kadry S. · Eur J Sci Res · 2008 · 22 · 508
9. 10.1179/00070598079827554410.1179/000705980798275544 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.183856810.1149/1.1838568 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0021-9673(98)01090-510.1016/S0021-9673(98)01090-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/0010-938X(75)90015-310.1016/0010-938X(75)90015-3 ↗
13. 10.1021/jp040045c10.1021/jp040045c ↗
14. 10.1179/00070597879835867110.1179/000705978798358671 ↗
15. 10.1016/0010-938X(88)90027-310.1016/0010-938X(88)90027-3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.05.08310.1016/j.electacta.2011.05.083 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.03610.1016/j.electacta.2006.12.036 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0010-938X(99)00039-610.1016/S0010-938X(99)00039-6 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4FD00244J10.1039/C4FD00244J ↗
20. 10.1021/ac50106a00510.1021/ac50106a005 ↗
21. Schikorr VG. · Z Elektrochem · 1929 · 35 · 65
22. 10.1149/2.0511709jes10.1149/2.0511709jes ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mspro.2012.06.03410.1016/j.mspro.2012.06.034 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10936810.1016/j.corsci.2021.109368 ↗
25. 10.1179/174327807X21478910.1179/174327807X214789 ↗
26. 10.5006/0010-9312-29.1.1810.5006/0010-9312-29.1.18 ↗
27. 10.1080/1478422X.2017.129435610.1080/1478422X.2017.1294356 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.206944010.1149/1.2069440 ↗
29. Cormet Testing Systems · 2006
30. 10.1016/0010-938X(83)90014-810.1016/0010-938X(83)90014-8 ↗
31. 10.1149/1.212759310.1149/1.2127593 ↗
32. Rebak RB. · MRS Online Proc Libr · 2007 · 985 · 804
33. Rebak RB. Factors affecting the crevice corrosion susceptibility of alloy 22. 2005.
34. Evans KJ · 2002 · 344
35. Dunn DS, Cragnolino GA, Yang L, et al. Localized corrosion susceptibility of Alloy 22. 2003.