A critical overview of monitoring infrastructural health using corrosion probes
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a state-of-the-art view and some fundamental considerations on developing and utilising corrosion probes (or sensors) as sensing components in infrastructural health monitoring (IHM) systems. Practical cases are presented to illustrate major challenges and recent progresses in corrosion probe research, with particular focus on cases of addressing some critical challenges by designing corrosion probes based on electrochemically integrated multi-electrode arrays. It is shown that at present successful application of corrosion probes for IHM in complex and dynamic environmental conditions has been limited, and the validity of corrosion monitoring data is often left unexamined. It is suggested that major advancements have to be made in the probe design, installation, and data analytics in order to significantly enhance the effectiveness and reliability of corrosion probe application in IHM systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering and Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Australia
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:9(897) ↗
2. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.01810.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.018 ↗
3. 10.1177/147592170303616910.1177/1475921703036169 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.02110.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.021 ↗
5. 10.1098/rsta.2006.192510.1098/rsta.2006.1925 ↗
6. Report on an oil pipeline explosion incident. Qingdao oil pipeline explosion. 2013 [cited 2017 Aug 31]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Qingdao_oil_pipeline_explosion
7. Hsu JW, Liu F. Taiwan gas blasts likely caused by faulty pipe [cited 2017 Aug 31]. Available from: http://online.wsj.com/articles/taiwan-gas-blasts-likely-caused-by-faulty-pipe-1406964902
8. Gosch E. WA gas supply cut 30pc by blast. The Australian, 2008 June 7.
9. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Technology innovation program report [cited 2017 Aug 31]. Available from: http://www.nist.gov/tip/prev_competitions/upload/ci_wp_031909.pdf
10. Committee on Research Opportunities in Corrosion Science and Engineering. Research opportunities in corrosion science and engineering. Washington (DC): National Research Council, The National Academies Press; 2011.
11. 10.1179/1743278215Y.000000001310.1179/1743278215Y.0000000013 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.11.03410.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.11.034 ↗
13. Tan MYJ. Principles and issues in structural health monitoring using corrosion sensors corrosion/2017. NACE; 2017 (paper no. 9240).
14. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.01.01810.1016/j.corsci.2011.01.018 ↗
15. 10.1533/9780857093585.3810.1533/9780857093585.38 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000018110.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000181 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.petrol.2008.12.02310.1016/j.petrol.2008.12.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.00610.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.006 ↗
19. Peng X, Zhang P, Chen L. Proceeding CSIE ‘09 Proceedings of the 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering, Vol. 5. Washington (DC): IEEE Computer Society; 2009. p. 651–655.
20. 10.1038/527441a10.1038/527441a ↗
21. Kane RD, Srinivasan S. Experience survey on corrosion monitoring and mitigation techniques for sweet well production. IntelCorr/96 Technical Sessions. Available from: http://www.corrosionsource.com/events/intercorr/techsess/papers/session6.
22. Srinivasan S, Kane RD. Prediction of corrosivity of CO 2 /H 2 S production environments. Corrosion/96, Paper No. 11, Denver, CO; 1996.
23. 10.5006/1.328771110.5006/1.3287711 ↗
24. 10.5006/1.327752910.5006/1.3277529 ↗
25. Bailey A. Petroleum News, Vol. 11, No. 20 Week of May 14, 2006.
26. 10.5006/1.328486810.5006/1.3284868 ↗
27. 10.1149/1.309847710.1149/1.3098477 ↗
28. Tan Y. Heterogeneous electrode processes and localised corrosion. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2013. p. 1–246.10.1002/9781118466360 ↗
29. Corrview. The benefits and limitations of corrosion coupons [cited 2017 Sep]. Available from: www.kemmfg.com/html/test/CorrViewonCorrosionCoupons.pdf
30. Joosten MW · Mater Perform · 1995 · 44
31. Kane R. · Chem Eng · 2007 · 34
32. Ben N, Tan Y. Fallen lamp post was checked 3 days before. The Straits Times, 2003 Mar 4.
33. 10.1016/0010-938X(81)90006-810.1016/0010-938X(81)90006-8 ↗
34. 10.1016/0010-938X(82)90107-X10.1016/0010-938X(82)90107-X ↗
35. Eden DA, Hladky K, John DG, et al. Electrochemical noise resistance. Corrosion 86, Paper 274. Houston: NACE; 1986.
36. 10.1149/1.222079610.1149/1.2220796 ↗
37. 10.1149/1.183736110.1149/1.1837361 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0010-938X(96)00061-310.1016/S0010-938X(96)00061-3 ↗
39. 10.5006/1.329035010.5006/1.3290350 ↗
40. 10.1149/1.139322810.1149/1.1393228 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.04.01010.1016/j.corsci.2004.04.010 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.01510.1016/j.corsci.2010.12.015 ↗
43. NACE Task Group TG 380. Under deposit corrosion (UDC) testing and mitigation methods, draft report distributed to members for review and comment; March 2009.
44. de Reus JAM, Hendriksen ELJA, Wilms ME, et al. 2005. Test methodologies and field verification of corrosion inhibitors to address under deposit corrosion in oil and gas production systems, CORROSION 2005, Paper no. 05288, 3–7 April, Houston, TX, USA.
45. Pedersen A, Bilkova K, Gulbrandsen E, et al. 2008. CO 2 corrosion inhibitor performance in the presence of solids: test method development, CORROSION/08, Paper no. 632, NACE Int., Houston, TX, USA.
46. Mok WY, Jenkins AE, Keenan SR, et al. 2005. Control of localized corrosion using green corrosion inhibitors, NACE Corrosion 2005, paper no. 05289, 3–7 April, 2005, Houston, TX, USA.
47. 10.5006/1.327755810.5006/1.3277558 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.01510.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.015 ↗
49. 10.1149/2.0091501eel10.1149/2.0091501eel ↗
50. 10.1149/2.0301510jes10.1149/2.0301510jes ↗
51. 10.1149/2.1101605jes10.1149/2.1101605jes ↗
52. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.02010.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.020 ↗