journal article·2021-04

Effect of Nb or Ta Interlayer on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Graphite/Ti6Al4V Alloy Joints

Xinjian Ma, Yangwu Mao, Yu Duan, Quanrong Deng, Geming Wang, Shenggao Wang

Advanced Engineering Materials· Volume 23· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Graphite/Ti6Al4V (TC4) joining has been conducted with Cu–Ti–Ni filler and refractory metal (Nb or Ta) interlayer. Microstructural characterizations reveal that defect‐free interfaces are obtained among the refractory metal interlayer, fillers, and substrates, suggesting favorable interfacial bonding in the joints. The diffusion and dissolution of Nb or Ta atoms into the molten fillers occur during joining, leading to the formation of (Ti, R) solid solution ([Ti, R]ss, R = Nb, or Ta) in the filler layers and thickness decrease in the interlayer. Two filler layers adjacent to the interlayer primarily consist of Ti–Cu, Ti–Cu–Ni intermetallics, and (Ti, R)ss. A Ti‐rich diffusion layer and a thin TiC‐containing layer exist near TC4 and graphite substrates, respectively. The joints brazed with Nb and Ta interlayers exhibit shear strength of 2 1.0 ± 2.7 MPa and 20.2 ± 3.1 MPa, respectively, both higher than those without interlayer, implying that the introduction of refractory metal interlayer may benefit the joint stress relaxation by its intermediate coefficient of thermal expansion and high ductility. The joint strength with Nb interlayer is slightly higher than that with Ta interlayer, mainly attributed to the relatively lower elastic modules and yield strength of Nb.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hubei Key Laboratory of Plasma Chemistry and Advanced Materials Wuhan Institute of Technology Wuhan 430073 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Wuhan Institute of Technology

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Ferguson K. · Adv. Mater. Process. · 2012 · 170 · 25
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.14310.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.143 ↗
3. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02774.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2012.02774.x ↗
4. 10.1111/ijac.1212310.1111/ijac.12123 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-015-9415-010.1007/s10853-015-9415-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.40710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.407 ↗
7. 10.1111/ijac.1286310.1111/ijac.12863 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.12.02810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.12.028 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.01910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.11.00510.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.11.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.02310.1016/j.jmst.2019.07.023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.02610.1016/j.ceramint.2016.01.026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmst.2019.04.01110.1016/j.jmst.2019.04.011 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10954310.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109543 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11665-019-3871-710.1007/s11665-019-3871-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.00610.1016/j.ceramint.2018.04.006 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.00410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.06.004 ↗
18. 10.1002/adem.20190071910.1002/adem.201900719 ↗
19. 10.1007/3-540-30437-110.1007/3-540-30437-1 ↗
20. 10.31399/asm.hb.v03.978162708163410.31399/asm.hb.v03.9781627081634 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.10928210.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109282 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.01110.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.05.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.04410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.044 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.09.01910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.09.019 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.04510.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.045 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.00510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.03.005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.11.05810.1016/j.msea.2006.11.058 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.24910.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.249 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15355910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153559 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.00510.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.005 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.22210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.222 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.04.09210.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.04.092 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.10.05710.1016/j.matlet.2017.10.057 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.07410.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.074 ↗
35. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00178-610.1016/1359-6454(95)00178-6 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15428610.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154286 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10761010.1016/j.matdes.2019.107610 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15500710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155007 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.12493210.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.124932 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.021 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.03.01710.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.03.017 ↗
42. 10.1002/adem.20180081010.1002/adem.201800810 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13809610.1016/j.msea.2019.138096 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.02110.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.021 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2019.10600710.1016/j.optlastec.2019.106007 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.11.00410.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.11.004 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2016.12.00910.1016/j.ijrmhm.2016.12.009 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15168510.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151685 ↗
49. Cardarelli F. · 2008