Design, Preparation, and Mechanical Property Investigation of Ti–Ta 3D‐Auxetic Structure by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, Ti–Ta alloy has become a hot material in orthopedic implants. At the same time, the metal lattice structure with a negative Poisson's ratio has a great prospect in the application of implants due to its unique mechanical properties. Herein, an antichiral three‐dimensional polyhedron (A3P) lattice structure with negative Poisson's ratio is designed. This lattice structure is prepared by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology using Ti–Ta alloy as the feedstock material. The surface morphology and relative density of the Ti–Ta samples built with different laser scanning speeds are compared for the optimization of the Ti–Ta's LPBF parameter. Then, the A3P structure of the Ti–Ta alloy is fabricated using the optimized LPBF parameters. The negative Poisson's ratio effect of the A3P structure is verified by finite element analysis (FEA) and compared with experimental results. The compression test results show that the yield strength and elastic modulus of the A3P structure are 9.2 MPa and 0.14 GPa, respectively, which is suitable for the orthopedics application. A3P structure has higher fracture energy compared with diamond structure, indicating it can absorb more energy in the fracture process. A3P shows a promising prospect in the application of orthopedics implantation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Materials and Manufacturing Beijing University of Technology Beijing 100124 P. R. China
Beijing Engineering Research Center of Eco-materials and LCA Beijing 100124 P. R. China
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0894-9166(16)30267-110.1016/S0894-9166(16)30267-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2009.10.005 ↗
3. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(200005)12:9<617::AID-ADMA617>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.03810.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.038 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.05010.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.050 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.10381110.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103811 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10822610.1016/j.matdes.2019.108226 ↗
8. 10.1039/C9BM01247H10.1039/C9BM01247H ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.01710.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.017 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853-017-1809-810.1007/s10853-017-1809-8 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20150248510.1002/adma.201502485 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-210.1016/S0020-7403(96)00025-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.12.01610.1016/j.msea.2005.12.016 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7MH00699C10.1039/C7MH00699C ↗
15. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.03510.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.06.035 ↗
16. 10.1098/rsif.2008.014210.1098/rsif.2008.0142 ↗
17. 10.1080/1745367061004590210.1080/17453670610045902 ↗
18. 10.1002/pssb.20077770510.1002/pssb.200777705 ↗
19. Gibson L. J. · J. Math. Phys. Sci. · 1982 · 382 · 25
20. 10.1016/j.taml.2016.02.00410.1016/j.taml.2016.02.004 ↗
21. D.Bornengo F.Scarpa C.Remillat inProc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G2005 Vol.219 p.185.10.1243/095441005X30216 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.05.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.07.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.07.007 ↗
24. 10.1002/adem.20160005310.1002/adem.201600053 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.05110.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.051 ↗
26. 10.1002/pssb.20160002710.1002/pssb.201600027 ↗
27. 10.1080/19475411.2022.205164010.1080/19475411.2022.2051640 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.513258910.1063/1.5132589 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.03710.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.037 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.01910.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.04610.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.046 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10377510.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103775 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.12.01110.1016/j.msea.2003.12.011 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.01210.1016/j.msec.2008.09.012 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.15308210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153082 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10990810.1016/j.msec.2019.109908 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13944510.1016/j.msea.2020.139445 ↗
38. 10.1533/ijcr.2004.028910.1533/ijcr.2004.0289 ↗
39. 10.1007/s40195-020-01052-w10.1007/s40195-020-01052-w ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.14110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.11.141 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.14022810.1016/j.msea.2020.140228 ↗
42. Niinomi M. · J. Artif. Organs · 2008 · 35 · 359
43. 10.1007/s11837-020-04235-z10.1007/s11837-020-04235-z ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.30710.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.307 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11652210.1016/j.actamat.2020.116522 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11759310.1016/j.actamat.2021.117593 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00886-710.1016/S0921-5093(98)00886-7 ↗
48. 10.2320/matertrans.45.154910.2320/matertrans.45.1549 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msec.2011.05.01310.1016/j.msec.2011.05.013 ↗