journal article·2018-01-02Open access

Measuring and understanding the critical duration and amplitude of anodic transients

Y. Huo, M. YJ. Tan

Abstract

Anodic transients are known to affect buried pipeline cathodic protection (CP) systems; however, their actual effects on pipeline corrosion have not been sufficiently quantified due to the lack of direct experimental evidences. In this work, a novel methodology developed based on an electrochemically integrated multi-electrode array has been used to visualise the dynamic effects of anodic transients on localised corrosion processes occurring on buried steel surfaces. It is shown that anodic transients do not necessarily cause steel corrosion, as long as their amplitude and duration are below critical values. The electrode array is able to determine these critical values accurately due to its ability to detect localised corrosion initiation, while the conventional coupon electrode is only able to estimate these values. The critical anodic transient duration has been explained as the incubation period for the breakdown of passivity formed on the steel surface exposed to CP-generated high pH conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Frontier Materials and School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia

Funding

Energy Pipelines CRC · Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program · APIA RSC

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Australian Standard AS 2832.1-2015 · 2015
2. NACE International Standard Recommended Practice RP-0169 · 1996
3. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.05110.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.051 ↗
4. Gummow RA. · Pipeline Gas J · 2010 · 237 · 7
5. 10.5006/1.328773510.5006/1.3287735 ↗
6. Wakelin RG · 199810.5006/C1998-98565 ↗
7. 10.5006/1.331605910.5006/1.3316059 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.02810.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.028 ↗
9. Martin B. · Corros Mater · 2006 · 31 · 12
10. Peabody A. · Mater Perform · 1979 · 18 · 27
11. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.03110.1016/j.corsci.2011.10.031 ↗
12. 10.5006/1.328065010.5006/1.3280650 ↗
13. 10.5006/1.357788510.5006/1.3577885 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.00210.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.002 ↗
15. Jankowski J. · Corros Rev · 2002 · 20 · 15910.1515/CORRREV.2002.20.3.159 ↗
16. Jankowski J. · Corros Rev · 2002 · 20 · 17910.1515/CORRREV.2002.20.3.179 ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0091501eel10.1149/2.0091501eel ↗
18. 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.01510.1016/j.elecom.2016.02.015 ↗
19. Tan YJ. Heterogeneous electrode processes and localised corrosion. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2013. p. 246.10.1002/9781118466360 ↗
20. 10.1179/1743278215Y.000000004410.1179/1743278215Y.0000000044 ↗
21. 10.5006/0010-9312-26.10.43110.5006/0010-9312-26.10.431 ↗
22. 10.1149/1.183861510.1149/1.1838615 ↗